Gawker 
Enter your username and password.
Hollywood, 1:30 PM
Mon Nov 9
36 posts in the last 24 hours
Tip your editors:
tips@defamer.com
Managing Editor:
Gabriel Snyder | Email
Defamer:
Richard Rushfield | Email
Original material is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution.
01:26 PM
01:22 PM
01:13 PM
10:35 AM
10:29 AM
10:27 AM
10:13 AM
Or Billy Zane, also with Kelly Brook , of "Survival Island" AND "Titanic"
10:54 AM
05:02 AM
07:13 AM
07:31 AM
The wording on the other site doesn't source their list, so we might have to assume that it's whomever popped into the author's mind.
07:46 AM
07:56 AM
And because you've given me a chance to clarify my original response; I didn't mean to imply that Will Smith is in the pantheon of great actors, but most people find him watchable and the critics like him.
08:26 AM
11:25 AM
11:35 AM
12:11 PM
12:44 PM
I'm a little hard-pressed to think of a badly-reviewed Meryl Streep film and your suggestion might explain the "Nerds of the Rings", but Ethan Hawke?
Not to mention that there was a time, Martin Sheen would be in any movie with a checkbook. He has slowed down some since the the West Wing residuals have been rolling in, but he's still in a lot of films and though he's a very good actor, you can't say that all of his movies have been good.
01:04 PM
04:59 AM
11/08/09
In these times of ennui,
To love a book or show no one knows,
In the name or irony.
But you kids who watch TV,
And twitter-text, while talking on a cell,
have the attention span of flies,
still waiting for a school bell.
And when the unheard of becomes popular,
and instant gratification takes too long,
you hate the very things whose praises you once sang.
This show requires TOTAL attention.
And a sense of history
And so much more...
Go Matt Weiner!!!! (And no, I've never even met him.) #madmen
11/07/09
11/07/09
A-effing-men. #themenwhostareatgoats
11/07/09
Until someone figures out how to do something un-gimmicky with it it will always be just that- a gimmick. #3d
11/07/09
I'm sure that, someday, someone will come up with a way to project 3D on a screen without requiring the viewer to put on glasses. Until then, 3D's not for me. #3d
11/07/09
The better computer animated films or mocap films have succeeded to varying degrees. Is it a game changer? Eh... probably not. But something like Beowulf (an awful awful movie) had a very lovely pop up book feeling to it where every thing in frame was at it's own depth. Sure, they had a couple swords pushed into the lens, but the highlight was really just the subtle depth in every single shot. I don't think it's enough to change the industry, but it can be a fun thing to see every once and awhile. If only it were coupled with a good movie. #3d
11/06/09
Reading the wikipedia article on sensurround now, they do mention that some theater patrons actually became sick, and there were reports of property damage.
Say what you want about it, but this was one movie novelty that really brought it. 3D has always been kind of disappointing and lame, but sensurround was actually a little too much.
11/06/09