Enter your username and password.
-
more about #defamer more comments → bodegacat: They didn't consult Greengrass in hiring a new writer for his movie? What imbecile made that decision? Directors' egos are assuaged all the time wit... more » jackbarber: Gawker -- where are you finding all these writers who hate pop culture? Answers inline: * Why would a director as talented as Greengrass even w... more » TedSez: I like these movies, but it's hard to imagine they're as expensive as other action flicks. Character actors, European locations, small-car chases.... ... more » MisterHippity: "Mr. Feder, you sure do ask a lot of stupid questions for a guy from New Jersey." more » MisterHippity: In the Bourne series, Damon is irreplaceable. Greengrass is not. more » snugbug: "..Greengrass, one of the contemporary cinema's most celebrated directors.."?! Aside from his twin Bourne entries, he made only two other movies. Gra... more » BadUncle: I'm more concerned with how this will affect future porn interpretations of the Bourne franchise. more » Swifter: They're all going to work for the Treadstone Corporation. more » unclevanya: Nikki Finke must be sleeping off a turkey hangover. more » heywhat: For #2, what substance could he have been taking for performance anxiety that would be controversial? more » Aatom: 4. Famous Author Rob Byrnes. more » BowlingForDollars: I would rather watch a test pattern. Seriously. I would. more » Airvault: This is all my fault. I passed out watching the six o'clock news and left my box tuned to NBC. This calls for another round of self-flagellation. more » DennyCrane: I can't imagine Jay being overly happy with this situation. Steering a ship that's going nowhere while watching Conan struggle to get his head above w... more » MissNormaDesmond: This is the TV ratings equivalent of global warming skepticism. more » -
#criticalreception
We Still Don't Know Whether Inglourious Basterds is Going to Suck or Not
We're Tarantino fans for sure, but a WWII movie about Nazi-killing Jews? We're a little skeptical, and the critics aren't helping our confusion.
More »
-
#girltalk
Megan Fox's 50 Best (& Worst) Bon Mots
The new Entertainment Weekly features a cover interview with Megan Fox. The loose-lipped star has demonstrated a knack for being quotable in the past. Here, we collect some of her more memorable remarks over the course of her short career. [Jezebel] -
#lists
'Entertainment Weekly' Hates Directors Who Are Good, Foreign, Or Female
Strap in, kids. Entertainment Weekly just put out their list of the 25 greatest active film directors, and here's who isn't on it: Woody Allen, David Lynch, or a single woman. So who is? More » -
#entertainmentmeekly
Popular Magazine Continues to Fluff Sad Vampire Books
Entertainment Weekly continues its embarrassing plunge into Twilight blowjobbery. They have yet another cover this week featuring the vampire movie's be-shagged leads. This one's a lame stretching-it story about a book about the movie. More » -
#lost
Consider This Your Giant, Missing 'Spoiler Alert' For EW's 'Lost' Cover Story
If there's one thing Entertainment Weekly loves even more than Twilight, it's Lost. However, fans may want to sic a smoke monster on the editors for divulging too much in their new cover story. More » -
#oscars
'Entertainment Weekly' Oscar Recall Forces Gwyneth And Renée To Declare 'No Takebacks'
The results of Entertainment Weekly's massive "Recall the Gold" project (in which thousands of industry insiders revote certain Oscar years to publicly humiliate past winners) are finally in! So which actors have been victimized? More » -
-
#angelinajolie
Angelina Jolie's Disappearing Mole
Entertainment Weekly's Q&A with Angelina Jolie is unremarkable—except for the remarkably unflattering photograph the magazine uses for its cover. Now it could be that EW wanted an image that matched in spirit the "candid interview" touted in the coverline. But I thought the Hollywood publicists demanded photo approval when negotiating interviews—even when they're pushing a movie such as Jolie's forthcoming Wanted (watch a chase from the movie, here). On the EW cover, the screen beauty's chin juts forward; lighting from above has left a shadow under her nose; the pores haven't been smoothed out in retouching; and there's a mole on her forehead. Well, there was one the issue itself (scan at left) under the letter "r"—in the same photo from the magazine's website (right), however, the spot isn't visible. Did EW bring out the photoshop only after the issue had gone to the printers? (After the jump, the cover and Angelina Jolie's blemishes in higher definition.) More »

