<![CDATA[Gawker: defamer, youtube]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: defamer, youtube]]> http://gawker.com/tag/defamer/youtube http://gawker.com/tag/defamer/youtube <![CDATA[Hugely Annoying YouTuber Scores Film Deal]]> Internet media is niche media. So you've probably never heard of "Fred," the online actor whose YouTube channel is followed by 1.5 million people. But don't worry: Fred's self-harm-inducing schtick will soon land in a theater near you.

How does an obnoxiously over-the-top kid on digital helium land a feature film deal, as Fred has done, according to a casting call obtained by TubeFilter? By having the most, or now second-most, followers of anyone on Google's video site. And by playing perfectly to Hollywood's fantasy that the branded serials its traditional TV studios specialize in can be profitably replicated online: Fred, you see, earns a reported six figures off this cheaply-produced stuff.

Don't tell studio honchos that, marvels of nature like "Fred" and sharp wits like Ze Frank not withstanding, YouTube will forever be dominated by cat videos, plane crashes and other spontaneously-obtained footage. After all, we wouldn't want the "Fred"s of tomorrow to miss their big Hollywood paydays.

[via All Things D]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5362833&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[The Web's Still Where Hollywood Dreams Go to Die]]> While this newfangled internet may be all the rage with kids, in Hollywood status terms, it's still the booby prize for ousted executives. The latest winner: the former boss of talent agency William Morris may be joining YouTube.

Until recently, Jim Wiatt served as Chairman of the venerable William Morris Agency, styling himself as a Bill Clinton BFF, savoir of the environment and aspirant to the throne of all Hollywood. That was until the Endeavor's Ari Emmanuel engineered a buyout of the agency, creating the new WME and promptly sent Wiatt hitting the bricks, hat in hand, and apparently, according to AllThingsD, headed to Google.

Sure, YouTube gets enough traffic every nanosecond to clog the Holland Tunnel from here until Armaggedon; but trading in private jet flown trips to inspect Megan Fox at work on the set in Tahiti or Reykjavík for the chance to oversee a collection cat videos is just a teeny bit of a comedown.

According to the report, Wiatt would work to convince Hollywood players to shoot videos for YouTube. So Brad and Angelina shouldn't be alarmed if a man in a Hugo Boss suit knocks on their door and asks, "Have you ever considered sharing with the world the adorable way your cat can open the refrigerator with his paws?" That man is not a salesman. He's somebody's ex-agent.

The history of Hollywood execs taking their magic online of course is a sad trail of tears. Michael Eisner parlayed his Disney chairmanship into the Executive Producers slot for web-serial Prom Queen. And Yahoo is still digging out from the damage wrought when Warner Bros. chair Terry Semel deigned to grace the portal with his star power.

But who knows, perhaps Wiatt has timed it brilliantly and for Hollywood, the web is a concept who's time has come at last.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5350960&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Michael Jackson's Mysteriously Creepy Doctor Speaks]]> Dr. Conrad Murray, Michael Jackson's personal physician and the man authorities believe injected him with a lethal dose of the surgical anesthetic Diprivan, issued a message late this afternoon to his supporters on YouTube.

In a one minute statement posted to the "Houstoncriminallaw" YouTube page, Murray said the following:

I want to thank all of my patients and friends who have sent such kind emails, letters and messages to let me know of your support and prayers for me and my family. Because of all that is going on, I am afraid to return phone calls or use my email. Therefore, I recorded this video to let all of you know that I have been receiving your messages. I have not been able to thank you personally, which as you know, is not normal for me. Your messages give me strength and courage and keep me going. They mean the world to me. Please don't worry — as long as I keep God in my heart and you in my life, I will be fine. I have done all I can do. I told the truth and I have faith that the truth will prevail. God bless you and thank you.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5340391&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Twilight Trailer Reaction Videos Will Ring In Our Ears Forever]]> The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.You thought those American Idol reaction vids were bad? Oh honey, no. You haven't seen anything until you've seen fans reacting, on camera, to the teaser for New Moon, the next Twilight twinklevamp movie. They're... loud.

That these fans are rabid and crazed isn't exactly news. Twi-twinkers, or whatever they call themselves, are some of the most insane devotees out there. They're as fantastical and lost-in-the-clouds as Harry Potter followers, but they're also dangerously sexualized (chastely). It's a heady and potent plasma. Hell, Entertainment Weekly has built a whole wildly successful cottage industry out of the irksome phenomenon.

Which is all to say that even though we know these girls (and, yes, boys) are zealous, we had no idea just how bad it can get until we saw the above compilation video of some folks from around the world reacting—with ear-piercing abandon—to images of shirtless werewolves and sparklesuckers and frowny moon goddess girls and everything else that goes down (but doesn't, you know, go down) up in rainy Forks, WA.

Lower the volume on your speakers before viewing. Seriously.

Oh, and here's what they're all freaking out about. See if you can time why they're shrieking when! (Hint: shirtlessness).

The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5284826&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Chris Brown to the Internet: 'I'm Not a Monster']]> The image associated with this post is best viewed using a browser.Rihanna-beating Chris Brown is promoting a new album (who isn't these days, amirite?) so he took the time to make a little YouTube video proclaiming the record's crazy dopeness, and also to thank the real fans and not the haters who think he's a monster. Which he is.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5271617&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Real Hip Hop Head Perched in Front of 'South Park' Poster Calls Out 50 Cent]]> This Canadian tween totally calls out 50 Cent for "whoring" himself with all his endorsement deals, and not keeping it real. His action figures and 'stache say: listen up, Fif.

This kid is the face of hip hop and we salute him for his beef-starting. Ante up. [via Adrants]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5151537&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Celebrity Streetwalker New York Sends YouTube Condolences To Jennifer Hudson]]> Hooker personality Tiffany "New York" Pollard (now there's someone we have a feeling is already well acquainted with Dr. Manhattan's cobalt nether regions) has addressed the media recently about Jennifer Hudson—whose skyrocketing career she doesn't envy in the least—and her fiance, a former I Love New York contestant whom she had the gall to liken to a gold-digging Al Reynolds. Having learned with the rest of us of the horrifying Hudson family deaths in Chicago, however, Pollard was consumed by guilt over her tactless remarks, and instantly set about righting her wrongs by issuing her deepest condolences to Hudson in the best way she knew how: by recording a heartfelt video message outside LACMA's streetlamp installation. She then went back about her regular routine of making kissy sounds at passing luxury vehicles in the hopes that one of them might contain the producer who will put her in his hip-hop movie musical, Dreamgrillz. [YouTube]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5069391&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[20 Movies About the First Great Depression To Watch During the Sequel]]> As we mentioned earlier, it's all too possible that another depression might be upon us. So how are to act, what are we to feel, what songs are we to sing? To find some answers, we dove into YouTube and (with some help from Metafilter) found 20 clips from 20 films about the Great Depression of the 1930's. They just might provide valuable insights into what the future holds. Watch and learn after the jump.

It's a Wonderful Life
A suicidal man named George Bailey is given a second chance at life after an angel shows him the good deeds of his past, including keeping people calm during a pre-Depression bank run.


Grapes of Wrath
Okies in the Dustbowl struggle to live amongst dying crops and farm foreclosures.


Ironweed (Sort of graphic, maybe NSFW)
A pair of ne'er do wells (Meryl Streep and Jack Nicholson) rage and romance in Depression-era Albany.


Bonnie & Clyde
Clyde Darrow and Bonnie Parker, played by Warren Beatty and Faye Dunaway, take to the bank robbing life during the 1930's. They meet a bullety end.


Annie
A bunch of orphans struggle through the Depression, hoping for rescue. Songs include "The Hardknock Life" and "We Would Like to Thank You, Herbert Hoover."


Paper Moon
A grifter and his precocious young daughter con their way through 1930's America.


Road to Perdition
A stoic hitman for the Chicagoland mob, Tom Hanks, takes to the road after his associates turn on him. Really a stunningly beautiful film, the last shot by the great cinematographer Conrad Hall. A modern classic.


Of Mice and Men
From the Steinbeck novel about a pair of migrant farmers roaming 1930's California.


O Brother, Where Art Thou?
The Coen brothers' Depression-set adaptation of 'Ulysses,' about prison escapees and the music they make.


They Shoot Horses, Don't They?
A grueling dance marathon contest is held during the Depression, in which desperate people compete for hours and days while a cruel emcee manipulates them.


The Purple Rose of Cairo
A bored and sort of sad 1930's gal (Mia Farrow) enjoys a romance with a movie character come to life (Jeff Daniels) in this Woody Allen comedy.


Cradle Will Rock
A truly beautiful film about art and censorship, "Cradle Will Rock" tells the story of a controversial play and the artists who struggled to keep it running. Please watch.


Modern Times
The Charlie Chaplin silent classic about his famous Tramp character navigating a troubled modern world.


Dogville
A disturbing but compelling film, Danish director Lars von Trier strips away all the scenery to tell the story of a Depression-era daughter of the mob (Nicole Kidman) who is first welcomed, then exploited by the denizens of a small Colorado town. Not for the faint of heart.


Hallelujah I'm a Bum
An Al Jolson musical about hobos.


Hard Times
A Charles Bronson rock 'em sock 'em about a street fightin' drifter during the Depression.


The Color Purple
The story of a kept woman, Celie, and her struggles to find her inner strength in the Depression-era Deep South.


Angela's Ashes
It went to Europe, too! The movie adaptation of Frank McCourt's memoir about his youth in Ireland.


Rambling Rose
Laura Dern's daddy, Robert Duvall, sells her into prostitution. Basically.


Gold Diggers of 1933
A silly musical about actresses. Features the Depression classic "We're In The Money."

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5061694&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Miley Cyrus Vs. Selena Gomez: 'Mean Girls' Comes To Life In 'Scheisty' Video Attack]]> We didn’t actually think she had it in her, but the world’s most rapidly maturing 15-year old, Miley Cyrus, is behaving like, well, a 15-year old for once. Just as reports surfaced that her rival in tween porn and Disney affection Selena Gomez may be dating Cyrus’ ex-boyfriend, we learn that the Battle Of The Tweens has been going on far longer than we thought. About a month ago, the wet t-shirt contestant decided to team up with her BFF and film a YouTube video mocking Selena and her partner in underage midriff-baring crime, Demi Lovato. Have we lost you? Not to worry! The only two things you really need to know before watching this oddly hilarious clip are: we’re slightly worried Miley has found her daddy’s liquor cabinet, and Demi Lovato is the next Demi Moore.

The NY Daily News is reporting that Gomez, the sultry-ish star of The Wizards Of Waverly Place, has been dating yet another 15-year old, singer Nick Jonas. As many of you may know (however embarrassing it is to admit), Jonas is the rumored intended recipient of most of Cyrus' kissy-face iPhone photos and pouty shower shots that hit the Internets recently. While Jonas is admittedly cute in an adolescent John Mayer sort of way, we don't see why a break-up with the kid should prompt Miley into such bitter antics. Making fun of Gomez and her alarmingly sexy best friend / fellow Disney star Demi Lovato in this clip, Cyrus drops some low-blows about the gap in Lovato's teeth (one that has since been fixed) and the fact that Lovato wears a touch of black make-up (and looks just fine in it). However, the attack seems to be backfiringl, mainly because Miley — who frequently succumbs to giggle attacks and slurring throughout the vid — made her rep as the good girl next door and not as a conniving backstabber (or, for that matter, as an burgeoning anti-Semite with her use of the word "scheisty"). Fasten your seatbelts, it looks like we have another Lohan vs. Duff feud brewing as we type.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5029296&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Judge Judy Vs. The YouTube Divorce Lady, Tricia Walsh-Smith]]> On Monday, a judge granted a divorce to Philip Smith from Tricia Walsh-Smith, on the grounds of cruel and inhuman treatment. Tricia made a name for herself in April when she began posting googly-eyed rants about her divorce on YouTube, complaining that her husband was evicting her from her Park Avenue apartment, and going on about what a terrible person he is. It seemed to have hurt her case in divorce court, as the judge upheld her prenup. So we decided to send her to a different court: That of Judge Judith Sheindlin.








]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5028919&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Estelle Getty's Death Reduces YouTube Eulogist To Puddle Of Tears]]> We'll admit to not having yet fully absorbed yesterday's news that Estelle Getty had shuffled off this mortal coil to the 1912-Sicily-in-the-sky. Stalled as we are in the early, "Why couldn't it have been someone from Empty Nest?!"-stages of the Kübler-Ross model, we hand you over now to YouTube video diarist fromthe60s. His lachrymal remembrance of "one of the funniest people I ever got to see on TV" is surely the most moving—if not the moistest—user-generated-video testimonial since Leave Britney Alone Guy beseeched us to leave Britney alone. We swear, without the courageousness of Young Gays Who Feel Too Much, there'd be literally nothing to do all day at the office besides work.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5028402&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[How Google could humiliate Viacom in YouTube lawsuit]]> Worried that your obsessive kitten-video viewing records on YouTube would be exposed in Viacom's copyright lawsuit against YouTube? You can relax. Google and Viacom lawyers have reached an agreement to anonymize records of usernames and IP addresses in YouTube's video-viewing logs, which Viacom wants to examine to show patterns of willful copyright infringement on the site. The accounts of employees of both companies, however, aren't included in the deal. And that suggests a negotiating tactic for Google.

Viacom wanted to carve out the records of YouTube employees' video views to show that they knowingly viewed copyrighted content — and in some cases, uploaded it. But Google could easily use its records to show Viacom employees doing exactly the same thing. It would hardly be a shocker: Viacom's Ifilm site is rife with pirated videos, but the site's traffic is too insignificant for copyright holders to get fussed.

Showing Viacom's double standards is an obvious move. What Google's lawyers are probably too naive to contemplate: Scouring YouTube's video logs for truly embarrassing videos viewed by Viacom employees, and leaking them to gossip blogs. That would be a dreadful invasion of privacy, of course — exactly what Viacom was asking for, before it finally backed down.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5025501&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Heads, Anticipation Explode as German 'Beverly Hills Chihuahua' Trailer Unveiled]]> We should have seen this coming after our first confession of love at first sight, but there is no doubt plenty of magic to be found in the growing number of reaction videos to the Beverly Hills Chihuahua trailer. Brooks Barnes had a glimpse at the burgeoning subgenre in yesterday's New York Times, but he nevertheless missed the boat on the international phase of Disney's Mexi-canine plot: Germany. Spoiler alert: You haven't really reacted to the BHC trailer until you've heard George Lopez's Teutonic counterpart introduce himself, "Ich bin ein Chihuahua." Is it still vaguely racist in German? Is it even worse? And either way, after all of its accompanying marketing horrors, why can we still not wait to see it? [YouTube]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=398579&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Did ABC Unduly Influence YouTube To Cover Up Fact That 'Wipeout' Is A Rip-Off of Viacom Show?]]> ABC has a big, dumb hit on its hands with Wipeout, which, despite a 5% drop from its premiere, finished second once again this week behind America's Got Talent. Alas, the network's would-be monopoly on lowest-common-denominator horseshit is threatened today as word gets around that ABC might be hewing a little too close to Spike TV's own padded-obstacle-course mash-up MXC. Spike is apparently taking the lift in stride, but MXC's co-creator has his own theories; after all, a rip-off would be one thing — the nets are built on them these days.

But a rip-off and a cover-up? After the jump, check out the video alleging Wipeout's fairly obvious theft — banned from YouTube, no less, thanks to ABC.

It would be easy enough to say what comes around goes around: MXC itself is a hyperedited mess of Japanese game show clips, recut and dubbed to mimic "a parody of over-produced network reality shows," notes co-creator and executive producer Larry Strawther — except the clips are licensed and have been running on Spike for almost five years now. Strawther apparently fought back after seeing Wipeout for the first time; you can imagine how poorly that went:

Within five days, ABC lawyers induced YouTube to block the video for copyright infringement. The video is obviously covered by the copyright act's fair use provision (Section 107) which explicitly allows usage for criticism, comment and parody. ...

YouTube did not once notify me or ask for a response before taking action to block the video. Even more disturbing to me is they have apparently altered the search results algorithm to benefit ABC and punish MXC. Whereas before Tuesday, June 24, if you typed in both "MXC" and "Wipeout" you would have seen at least hundreds of fan-generated videos showing clips from our show MXC. Now if you type in MXC and Wipeout, you are taken to results for motocross — which uses MX as an acronym.

Le scandal! Strawther is pretty classic, though, essentially claiming on his site that Spike isn't paying him for MXC reruns and implying that ABC might be worthy of picking up the slack. We see a cease-and-desist in his future long before any settlement, but it's a valuable object lesson to you network execs out there: If you must steal, keep it to talent shows and crime franchises. Falling idiots in helmets are way, way too easy to trace.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=398218&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Why The Church Of Scientology Won't Let Me Show You Their Propaganda Videos]]> way-to-happiness-foundation-logo.pngWhy did the Church of Scientology buy a channel on YouTube? Well, remember how a video of Tom Cruise babbling about Scientology cropped up on YouTube? And how the Church got the video taken down so we put it on Gawker and then another copy stayed on YouTube? Well the Church tried to fight its critics with a regular user account, but that didn't work; the organization had no more visible cred than the anonymous people accusing it of suppressing free speech. So now the Church bought themselves this fancy channel stocked with 82 videos about their religion. Most are just bland, and some are delightfully creepy, even if they lack the star power of Tom Cruise. But I'm not allowed to show them here.

One of YouTube's selling points is the ability to embed its videos on other pages. This allows free discussion of those videos, just like excerpting an image or text. But the Church turned off embedding in their clips. In fact, you can't link to just one video by clicking from the Church's official channel. You have to search for their videos.

Then you can find this creepy clip of a ceremony celebrating the Church's "International Way To Happiness Foundation." A South African dignitary thanks the Church (or more precisely, a supposedly secular wing of the Church) for starting a program in his country's prisons. An Israeli publisher thanks the Church for healing the Middle East, as does a Palestinian education official.

In another video, a narrator explains how you are a thetan, not a body or mind. Another clip introduces the auditing process. In that clip, it sounds weirdly like the therapeutic process in the psychiatric field that Scientologists like Tom Cruise have publicly denounced.

But most of the clips are innocent slideshows with a narrator gently listing beliefs that would fit with mainstream Christianity. Every clip has a cheesy grocery-store soundtrack. The net effect is to make the Church look like another dull religion or self-help class and not, as some critics label it, a murderous cult.

Either way, because the Church disabled the option to embed their videos, I can't show you the clips here but can only link to them. I've downloaded some copies, but uploading them here might violate copyright law as long as there's another copy on the Church's channel.

The Church paid for its special channel. Anyone can disable embeds, but a specially formatted user page doesn't come free. YouTube helped the Church integrate its custom menu into the channel, though of course it didn't create any of the content. Nor did YouTube endorse the Church or give it control over other users' videos, and all such accusations I saw provided no evidence.

But I'm baffled why the Church, after putting together such a friendly little propaganda channel, not only disabled all comments (a reasonable way to avoid actually diving into two-way conversation) but disabled embedding and turned its channel into a tidy menu. That guarantees that hardly anyone will stumble onto the videos. I guess the rest of the world should be glad that the Church doesn't get the Internet.

What may piss off some viewers is that the Church is advertising their channel all over YouTube. This might explain the no-embed rule; the Church is specifically targeting YouTube users, not the Internet at large, though I see no reason to specifically hide from everyone outside of the video site. But one user was creeped out by Church ads appearing on popular channels like Smosh, Awkward Pictures, and Playboy, even though any creator can ask YouTube to keep certain advertisers off its page. Guess everyone just needed the money. At least I can still show you the anti-Church videos.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=385468&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[How Much Did Everyone In The South Park YouTube Episode Really Make?]]> A friend at YouTube told me that maybe a half-dozen people make their living as YouTube creators. Everyone else in the site's partner program gets maybe a couple thousand bucks for millions of views (like our guest writer Yuri Baranovsky). How can someone figure out their personal worth to YouTube? Good question. Tech and media blogs like paidContent keep guessing and making rough calculations, but it's all fake numbers based on spotty data. So how much did the YouTube stars in that South Park episode — the ones waiting in YouTube's office for their money until they all fight to the death — how much money did they really make?

The vast majority of YouTube partners haven't talked about what they're pulling in. Neither has the company. And there's really no incentive to; revealing the pay would only make users more agitated when they're not at the top of the list. So we're not sure how much Tay Zonday or Chris Crocker are making. But I can tell you this about the Internet stars that South Park killed off:

1. Tay Zonday, "Chocolate Rain": Unknown, but possibly a good amount. Probably made more from his Dr. Pepper commercial.
2. Tron Guy: Probably nothing; he was only part of other people's videos
3. Gary Brolsma, "Numa Numa": Maybe a little from his uncomfortably bad sequel that racked up nine million views, though this was before the partner program officially launched. But the original Numa Numa, which got eleven million views, was just someone else's copy; remember that Gary was the last huge video hit before YouTube, back when everyone had to download Windows Media and Quicktime files.
4. Star Wars Kid: Nothing. Settled a lawsuit against the kids who put his video online (again pre-YouTube though copies are up at the site), and some bloggers raised money for him out of sympathy.
5. Sneezing Panda: Nothing.
6. Dramatic Prairie Dog: Nothing. Apparently taken from CollegeHumor.com, where someone took a clip from a Japanese show and added the dramatic sound. One site claims it was an animated GIF long before it became a video.
7. Chris Crocker, "Leave Britney Alone": Probably nothing; he doesn't have ads on his channel so he must not be a partner. And I haven't heard anything new about the reality show he was supposed to star in.
8. Chinese Back Street Boys: Almost certainly nothing; the clips seem to have been uploaded by someone else, and no ads appear near them.
9. Laughing Baby: Nothing. No ads. A shame too, cause this video got over 45 million views.
10. Afroninja: Nothing. The clip wasn't his.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=381004&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Nine Inch Nails Wants You! (To Make Its Videos For Free!)]]> Pinned to his La-Z-Boy by the money bags recently delivered in the self-distribution triumph that is Nine Inch Nails' latest album Ghosts I-IV — "800,000 transactions in its first week, totaling $1.6 million in revenues," according to Reuters — helpless leader Trent Reznor apparently has little to do but watch online video until his bandmates dig him out. There will be no Dakota Fanning ogling for Reznor, however, who's now soliciting movies from fans for the "Ghosts Film Festival":

The concept is for you to take whatever tracks you feel inspired by from Ghosts and create what you feel should accompany them visually. You will be able to see all of the submissions, and a team of us (including me) will be sorting through them and setting aside ones we feel are exceptional. Eventually (within a couple of months?) we will present a virtual "film festival" with me and some special guests presenting selections of your work.

Don't get your hopes up for prize hardware or other material glory, Reznor adds; the most you can win is some schlubby YouTube love and maybe, if you're lucky, a spot in the backdrop at a one-time-only NIN performance of Ghosts. But the more ambitious among you can always take solace in your role as a grass-roots shill pushing the phenomenon as far into the dyed black as it can go, with only a couple hundred grainy cell-phone movies, some musty, goth-chick nostalgia and Mark Romanek's all-time great "Closer" video standing between you and cinematic immortality. Or you could always, you know, just watchalong with the rest of us. We're just saying.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=368867&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Teenage Mother: "Nine Months Of Trouble", Forty Years Before Juno]]> Today, one of our new favorite websites linked to the trailer for Teenage Mother, a 1967 scare film that, as a heavily-accented voiceover explains, "may very well be the most impawtant movie you will ever see!" The "teenage muthah" in question is 15-year-old actress Arlene Sue, who rocks knee-high boots, granny panties, and an awesome head of hair. (She also thinks sexy thoughts while eating chicken wings.) According to a review of the film on IMDb, the movie features a scene of a town meeting during which a "film made by doctors for doctors" is screened; a film so with such a graphic depiction of childbirth that it'll make women never want to have sex again. The awesome clip — without the birth scene! — after the jump.



Trailer For The Film "Teenage Mother" (1967) [Feminist Law Professors, via YouTube]
Teenage Mother [IMDB]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=359280&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Chris Crocker Is Back! And Disappointing.]]> The effeminate young man who requested that the country lay off of Britney a bit has posted a video, the first one he's put on YouTube since his tearful plea of September 7. (He did post some others but immediately removed them, but this one's stayed up for a full day now.) In the video, Chris Crocker (still not his real name!) announces his return, shows us how scared he is, doesn't mention the reality show he supposedly landed two weeks after his rant, and sounds just like the passport-losing party-going indie filmmaker Arin Cromley. Also, fingerquotes! Which is why you should totally click through and watch.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=351862&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Perez Hilton banned from YouTube]]> Self-proclaimed "queen of all media" Perez Hilton no longer reigns on YouTube. Girlfriend managed to get not one but two accounts banned from the Google-owned video site after he "posted a very critical video about their practices." Naturally, Hilton reacted with calm and reason unconstrained diva fury. Here's Hilton's rant:

Ughhh. We have always been the biggest YouTube supporter and fan. We're heartbroken by their mismanagement of this whole situation ... Note to anyone creating videos and using video networking sites: don't keep all your eggs in one basket! You may get burned!
Perez Hilton is one of the biggest blog success stories. His site, for which he dubiously claims around 150 million "impressions" a month, has had problems before. In June, his ad company BlogAds had to step in and provide him with server space after his webhost kicked him offline. The cause? Repeated run-ins with photo agencies which say he infringed their copyright.

Hilton did not mention what caused his suspension, aside from the critical video. YouTube did not respond to repeated requests for comment, but then again, when do they?

More: The fatal misstep that got Perez Hilton banned

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=335558&view=rss&microfeed=true