<![CDATA[Gawker: defamer, vanessa minnillo]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: defamer, vanessa minnillo]]> http://gawker.com/tag/defamer/vanessaminnillo http://gawker.com/tag/defamer/vanessaminnillo <![CDATA[Why Lindsay Lohan Is To Blame For Miley Cyrus' Latest Nude Photo Scandal]]> Another day, another provocative pictorial series starring a scantily clad Miley Cyrus. The latest batch of photos featuring the 15-year old Billion Dollar Girl staging her own personal Playboy Jr. shoot for boyfriend Nick Jonas has surfaced online, thanks to a hacker who claims he got a hold of everything on Miley’s iPhone. We’ve already seen Miley’s makeout sessions with various girls and boys, eating her clothes off and, of course, daringly flashing her bare back in Vanity Fair. But now we have the (uncomfortable) pleasure of seeing the then-14 year old showering in a wet t-shirt, photographing her widely seen midriff and, in a highly anticipated step closer to actual kiddie porn, totally topless. And judging by Miley’s posing style, stances, and familiar Blow A Kiss act, this is not a matter of kids growin’ up so fast these days. If you’re looking to point fingers, look no further than original self-produced porn star Lindsay Lohan:

Over the weekend, an entrepreneurial online hacker going by the telling name of "Trainreq" posted the two photos of Miley playing dress-up with her iPhone and picking up on that whole wet t-shirt trend to the right and, according to alleged time stamps, they were taken in October 2007, meaning Miley had yet to blow out her 15th birthday candle. Adding an exclamation point to this latest Cyrus Photo Scandal is the hacker's claim that he has "worse pictures" than these. So where oh where could such an underage girl get the inspiration for "artfully" done point-and-zoom collections? Oh, right.

From her Where My Cokepants At? shoot with mother of the century Dina, to enlisting C-listers like Vanessa Minnillo to eat her top off for her, Lindsay Lohan has been a fan of grainy amateur photo shoots for years. Even an occasion as non-momentous as Jeremy Piven's birthday serves as an excuse to put on her best nude-hued bikini and imitate a call girl. So for those of you embarrassingly salivating at Miley and her prematurely dirty mind? Make sure to send a thank-you note to Lindsay and her bountiful assets, without which little girls everywhere wouldn't even know how to mangle their pout into "sexy" mode.

[Photo credits: Egotastic, AOL, Nerve]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5024904&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Could You Come If You Had To Look At Nick Lachey's Sex Face? A Poll]]> Ah, sex face. The histrionic Oh my god, oh my god, oh my god YES of the male species! But where we've all been the widely-mocked overdramatic moaner across the hall at least once, no one ever gets to laugh at the little constipated boy intensity on the face of the partner forcing us to fake it that hard. Which is why we are so very grateful to the Mexican paparazzi for capturing, albeit grainily, Nick Lachey giving it to Vanessa Minnillo from behind so she doesn't have to look at him. ANYWAY, please send us good sex face photos, because we reeeeally scraped the bottom of the barrel to bring you this sorta NSFW sex face poll.

Gawker Media polls require Javascript; if you're viewing this in an RSS reader, click through to view in your Javascript-enabled web browser.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=275233&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Lindsay Lohan's Stabby Co-Star Revealed!]]> vanessa-minnillo.jpgPage Six has positively identified former TRL and ET microphone-holder and current Nick Lachey sexual partner Vanessa Minnillo as Lindsay Lohan's semi-mysterious co-star in the indie cokesploitation drama Crazed Lohan Dices With Death, which premiered to critical acclaim in the UK's News of the World yesterday. Puzzlingly, Page Six concludes that the sporadically employed Minnillo "might have a hard time getting a new job because of the risqué party pictures," a statement that leads us to believe that they didn't even bother to view the photos before casting such a dim light on the host's career prospects. The aspiring actress clearly steals every scene she's in from her higher-billed, overrated castmate, whether playing the role of sultry victim or breast-stabbing villainess, demonstrating that she'd make a perfectly acceptable—and much more affordable—alternative to Lohan should the troubled starlet linger in Promises longer than the too-patient producers of Poor Things are willing to wait.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=266080&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Defamer Corrections: On F-Bombs, 5-Second Delays, And Human Error]]> With all the correction space we're allotted for a single post already devoted to admitting our amnesia about the FCC's jurisdiction for levelling indecency fines in our earlier item about comely, sailor-mouthed MTV microphone holder Vanessa Minnillo's New Year's Eve f-bomb, we're making room here to share a helpful publicist's clarification about our mistaken assumption that the unbleeped expletive was a result of the show's lack of a time-delay:

I just wanted to let you know that MTV was actually on a standard industry 5-second delay for our New Year's Eve show. Unfortunately, due to "human error" we did not catch the Vanessa Minnillo mistake.

Best,
[name redacted]
Sr. Publicist
MTV

So there you have it: Despite MTV's laudable adherence to the industry-standard delay intended to protect us from exactly such an incident of profane, spontaneous exuberance, "human error" (and in the interest of avoiding further corrections and clarifications, we'll refrain from speculating about the effect of cheap champagne on a censor's dump-button reaction time) still allowed our delicate ears to be sullied by an f-word. We're sure that MTV, as responsible custodians of the trust that cable providers place in them to provide decent programming to their easily scandalized subscribers, are currently exploring ways that the fallible, human element can be eliminated from future semi-live broadcasts in the interest of avoiding such regrettable incidents.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=225593&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Vanessa Minnillo's New Year's F**cking Eve]]>
Those among you who tuned into MTV Goes Gold: New Year's Eve 2007 Sunday night were treated to VJ/Nick Lachey celebuwhore rebound girl Vanessa Minnillo, sauced and dressed like a foil-wrapped baked potato, accidentally letting an F-bomb fly—a gaffe she immediately catches by going deadly silent and turning helplessly to her co-host.

Having opted out of the 7-second delay in order to give viewers at home the most accurate countdown possible was a programming decision that will ultimately come back to bite MTV corporate parent Viacom, when the FCC gods high on Mount Decency throw down multimillion dollar fines* like thunderbolts, followed by a series of executive meetings over the financial feasibility of keeping on a foul-mouthed Minnillo, versus shitcanning her for another disposable Jessica Alba-type talking head who can effectively drum up the requisite TRL excitement about Fall Out Boy's latest without relying on an arsenal of four-letter descriptors.

*Correction:As a reader reminded us, FCC's jurisdiction reaches only to broadcast networks, not cable, so the slip won't result in fines, regardless of how many impressionable young MTV watchers now actively pepper their slang with profanity in an attempt at mimicking their VJ hero. We regret still being buried too deeply in our New Year's Eve K-hole to remember this salient fact at the time the above item went to press.

Correction II: A publicist's much-needed clarification about the time-delay issue is here.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=225483&view=rss&microfeed=true