<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gawker: Defamer, Rachel Dratch]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gawker.com/tag/defamer/rachel dratch</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Gawker posts tagged 'defamer, rachel dratch']]></description>
			
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[SNL Dooms Two More Women To Lives of Obscurity]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/2009/09/custom_1252447803524_Together.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2009/09/500x_custom_1252447803524_Together.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The saddest news for <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MICHAELA WATKINS" href="http://gawker.com/tag/michaela-watkins/">Michaela Watkins</a> and <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged CASEY WILSON" href="http://gawker.com/tag/casey-wilson/">Casey Wilson</a> isn't that they are <a href="http://ausiellofiles.ew.com/2009/09/04/exclusive-michaela-watkins-shocked-by-snl-firing/">out of jobs on <em>Saturday Night Live</em></a>. It's that they're entering the tradition of the show's women who are never heard from again. <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged JAN HOOKS" href="http://gawker.com/tag/jan-hooks/">Jan Hooks</a>, anyone?</p>
<p>While Will Farrell is allowed to make mediocre comedy after mediocre comedy, Jan Hooks hasn't worked since 2004. Yes, <em>SNL</em> has launched the careers of countless male superstars, but what has it done for the women? Pretty much bubkas. There are a few notable exceptions&mdash;Tina Fey, Gilda Radner, Amy Poehler, and Julia Louis-Dreyfus, for instance&mdash;but whither Ellen Cleghorne, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged VICTORIA JACKSON" href="http://gawker.com/tag/victoria-jackson/">Victoria Jackson</a>, and <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged JULIA SWEENEY" href="http://gawker.com/tag/julia-sweeney/">Julia Sweeney</a>? From the show's original cast, Jane Curtin may have gone on to several sitcoms, but <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged LARAINE NEWMAN" href="http://gawker.com/tag/laraine-newman/">Laraine Newman</a> has been doing little more than guest spots and voice work for the better part of the decade.</p>
<p>Luckily <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged ANA GASTEYER" href="http://gawker.com/tag/ana-gasteyer/">Ana Gasteyer</a> and Christine Ebersole went on to find steady work on Broadway, but that's kind of like being the chastest girl at a Sex-aholics Anonymous meeting. Why can Jimmy Fallon get his own late-night talk show, when <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged NORA DUNN" href="http://gawker.com/tag/nora-dunn/">Nora Dunn</a> and <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged CHERI OTERI" href="http://gawker.com/tag/cheri-oteri/">Cheri Oteri</a> are at home waiting by their phones? And for every Janeane Garofalo &mdash; who fled <em>30 Rock</em> after one season, allowing her to escape with her career intact &mdash; a dozen Siobhan Fallones or Mary Grosses float out of sight. Maybe they should have taken the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MAYA RUDOLPH" href="http://gawker.com/tag/maya-rudolph/">Maya Rudolph</a> route and married a hipster director and done a drama. Now people are talking about how she's an "actress" instead of a comedian.</p>
<p>And it's not that these women aren't funny; they did scale to the very pinnacle of their trade by earning their places on the show. Hollywood doesn't know what to do with funny women. After all, it would rather have an attractive but bland actress playing the female lead on a sitcom rather than someone who has actual comedic timing. Look at who is starring in this season's romantic comedies: Amy Adams, Sandra Bullock and Jennifer Aniston, three ladies who never let themselves get pigeon-holed as "funny."</p>
<p>Don't worry, Casey and Michaela, just remember that there was a little girl named Sarah Silverman who got fired from <em>SNL</em> after one season too. She went out there and did her own thing, and in the end talent won out, and now she has her own show on basic cable! Look at how far you can go!</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://defamer.gawker.com/5354994/snl-dooms-two-more-women-to-lives-of-obscurity]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5354994]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[curses]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ana gasteyer]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[casey wilson]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cheri oteri]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[christine ebersol]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ellen cleghorn]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Jan Hooks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jane curtain]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jeanine garofalo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[julia sweeney]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laraine newman]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Mary gross]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[maya rudolph]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Michaela Watkins]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nora dunn]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rachel dratch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[saturday night live]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Siobhan fallon]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[victoria jackson]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 08 Sep 2009 18:33:10 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Moylan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5354994&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Wherein Amy Poehler and Rachel Dratch Finally Introduce 'Spring Breakdown']]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/1/2009/01/thumb160x_dratch_poehler.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />The long, <i>loooonng</i> delayed <i>Spring Breakdown</i> finally premiered late Friday night at Sundance, where stars Amy Poehler, Rachel Dratch and Parker Posey found worshipful fans and perhaps their last shot at a theatrical release.</p>

<p>The buddy flick ships the three socially allergic women off to spring break at South Padre Island, where the eco-idealist political gofer Becky (Posey) is assigned to chaperone her boss's own awkward daughter (Amber Tamblyn). Becky's BFFs Judi (Dratch) and Gayle (Poehler) join up, soon losing &mdash; and ultimately finding &mdash; themselves in the seasonal co-ed debauchery. It's <i>Revenge of the Nerds</i> meets <i>Sex and the City</i>, with all of the former's giddy depravity and the latter's sharp camaraderie, but with neither film's relative ambition. Director Ryan Shiraki borrows heavily from the '80s playbook of underdog cheapies, with about their same inconsistency and cult potential.</p>
<p>Those margins aren't satisfactory for Warner Bros., which produced <i>Breakdown</i> several years ago, offloaded it to its troubled (now defunct) Warner Independent Pictures label, and now leans toward a straight-to-DVD release. The enthusiastic full house at the Library Theater would disapprove. If only it were up to them.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, Poehler had made the journey to Park City at around 5 a.m. and greeted us with a gape, maybe a half-yawn, we couldn't tell. "Pardon me," she said. "My lips are out of juice." Do we ever know the feeling. But it's the world premiere! Let's celebrate! "The world premiere!" Her eyes alit. "I like that. It <i>was</i> fun. It was kind of a dream world."</p>
<p>Adding to the surreal quality was the likelihood that we were one of five audiences &mdash; only at Sundance &mdash; who may ever see <i>Spring Breakdown</i> in a movie theater. Poehler shrugged. "Warner's sister is going to put it out. I think?" Really? "Maybe they still will. Like I said, I think there's an arm of Warner Independent or Warner's sister that's going to put it out. It's going to be Warner <i>Independent</i> Independent."</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/defamer/2009/01/dratch_shiraki_01.jpg" height="240" width="275" class="right">The optimism cooled proportionately as the <i>Breakdown</i> family exited into the freezing Library parking lot, where Shiraki (pictured here with co-writer Dratch after the premiere) declined to discuss its limbo, and one disappointed insider told us even an exuberant Sundance response wouldn't necessarily guarantee the film a theatrical life. It has champions among the brass &mdash; including WB production exec Sara Schechter, who was on hand gauging reaction as well &mdash; but if Warner Independent couldn't stand by a crowd-pleasing Oscar lock like <i>Slumdog Millionaire</i>, the adage around Park City goes, what odds did an microbudget indie comedy stand? Even (or especially, in the minds of WIP skeptics) <i>with</i> Poehler, Dratch and Posey.</p>
<p>Technically, the jury remains out. But it seems clear enough that if you happen to be among the hardcore hopeful for whom <i>Breakdown</i> is a lost, lamented moviegoing grail, we'd say you have one week in Park City to track it down. That whole "theater near you" thing seems a long shot from here.</p>
<p><em>[Photo credits: Top, Getty Images; bottom, STV]</em></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://defamer.gawker.com/5133753/wherein-amy-poehler-and-rachel-dratch-finally-introduce-spring-breakdown]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5133753]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[sundance]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[amy poehler]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[parker posey]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rachel dratch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Spring Breakdown]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 17 Jan 2009 15:30:51 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[STV]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5133753&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The 10 Celebrities With The Most To Lose at Sundance '09]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/1/2009/01/340x_sff_losers.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;"/>Sundance affords as many opportunities for career setbacks in 10 days as it does for meteoric advancement &mdash; not even Robert De Niro or Dakota Fanning could get out of Park City alive.</p>

<p>This year's vintage features another barrel of celebrities with equally little margin for error, some less endangered than others. For your handy trajectory-watching reference, we've narrowed their ranks to 10 of the most interesting:</p>
<p>1. <b>Ashton Kutcher:</b> The festival itself describes Kutcher's gigolo farce <i>Spread</i> as "such a perfectly tuned, contemporary depiction of the trials and tribulations of sleeping your way to wealth and success that, guilty pleasure or not, it's irresistible." Either the responsible programmer's tongue is so far in his cheek it'll leave a bruise, or we must forge on with the faith that Kutcher is up to credibly depicting those fraught "trials and tribulations." He's a producer on this as well, upping the skeevy self-casting factor proportionately with the stakes that accompany putting this on the Sundance market. <b>THREAT LEVEL</b>: Severe</p>
<p>2. <b>Rachel Dratch:</b> As co-writer and co-star of the Midnight section highlight <i>Spring Breakdown</i>, Dratch is nominally on the hook for delivering a sort of inverted <i>Sex and the City</i>: Three terminally unsophisticated women (played by Dratch, Amy Poehler and Parker Posey) entrusted to chaperone a teenager to spring break wind up cavorting with the savage youth. Laffs, empowerment and, hopefully for Dratch, a cult following ensue, exhuming this film from the shallow grave where it has languished for months and on to video shelves where it's <a href="http://jezebel.com/5078624/spring-breakdown-reflects-a-break-down-for-women-in-comedies">likely to make its next stop</a>. <b>THREAT LEVEL</b>: Elevated</p>
<p>3. <b>Pierce Brosnan:</b> A man for whom being the most tone-deaf cast member in history's biggest musical is his primary film accomplishment of the last five years, Brosnan needs his grieving-dad weepie <i>The Greatest</i> to find legs during its Saturday premiere &mdash; and <i>not</i> those of critics and buyers fleeing the Racquet Club in terror. Like Kutcher and about a million other actors to travel here with movies over the years, he's got a producer credit, which means he needs a sale, which means to needs to be on his game. For once. Whatever that might be. <b>THREAT LEVEL:</b> Dire</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/defamer/2009/01/krasinski_sff.jpg" height="309" width="240" class="right">4. <b>John Krasinski:</b> He'll be on hand presenting his writing-directing debut <i>Brief Interviews With Hideous Men</i>, an adaptation of the novel by David Foster Wallace. It's a double-jeopardy scenario risking both his own artistic humiliation and the ultimate torpedoing of his recently deceased source. That said, he's <i>John Krasinski</i> &mdash; how bad can it really be? Wait, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0762114/">don't answer that</a>. <b>THREAT LEVEL:</b> Moderate</p>
<p>5. <b>Jim Carrey:</b> One month removed from a lukewarm success with <i>Yes Man</i>, Carrey isn't traveling to Sundance to reinvent himself as an indie influence-peddler. But he still has to convince distributors and a game if cynical-by-default press corps that <i>I Love You Phillip Morris</i> is anchored in anything other than the Carrey-on-McGregor romance gimmick. As <a href="http://defamer.com/5130965/the-5-films-likeliest-to-cause-a-sundance-09-bidding-war">mentioned here yesterday</a>, this has as much potential to be this year's <i>What Just Happened</i> as it does to be its <i>Little Miss Sunshine</i>; don't look for it to be much in between. <b>THREAT LEVEL:</b> Critical</p>
<p>6 - 10. <b>Billy Bob Thornton's co-stars:</b> The man whose one-time castmates have <a href="http://defamer.com/5035547/the-curse-of-billy-bob-thornton-overtakes-dark-knight-curse-in-hollywood-death-toll">occasional trouble staying alive</a> arrives with two wildly disparate films &mdash; the LA excess potboiler <i>The Informers</i> and the crap-salesman dramedy <i>Manure</i> &mdash; featuring two wildly disparate ensembles including Mickey Rourke, Kim Basinger, Kyle MacLachlan, Winona Ryder, Tea Leoni and others. Everyone make sure you have your affairs in order before coming to Park City. <b>THREAT LEVEL:</b> Imminent</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://defamer.gawker.com/5131966/the-10-celebrities-with-the-most-to-lose-at-sundance-09]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5131966]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[sundance]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[alert]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ashton kutcher]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[billy bob thornton]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jim carrey]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[john krasinski]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pierce brosnan]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rachel dratch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 15 Jan 2009 11:43:48 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[STV]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5131966&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Spring Breakdown Reflects A Break Down For Women In Comedies]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/39/2008/11/thumb160x_springbreakdown110608.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />Just over a year ago I <a href="http://jezebel.com/gossip/living-dolls/the-stepfordization-of-hollywoods-comely-comediennes-313431.php">wrote a post</a> about the dearth of female-driven comedies, and mentioned that I was excited about <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #springbreakdown" href="http://jezebel.com/tag/springbreakdown/">Spring Breakdown</a></em>, the Warner Brothers comedy starring <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #amypoehler" href="http://jezebel.com/tag/amypoehler/">Amy Poehler</a>, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #parkerposey" href="http://jezebel.com/tag/parkerposey/">Parker Posey</a>, and <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #racheldratch" href="http://jezebel.com/tag/racheldratch/">Rachel Dratch</a>. I remembered the movie the other day and went to IMDB to see when it was going to be released. Well the answer seems to be <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spring_Breakdown">"never,"</a> at least not on the big screen. <em>Spring Breakdown</em>, about three geeky women who try to relive the crazy college days they never had, is going straight to DVD. <a href="http://www.womenandhollywood.blogspot.com/">Women & Hollywood</a> blogger <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #melissasilverstein" href="http://jezebel.com/tag/melissasilverstein/">Melissa Silverstein</a> and I try to figure out why <em>Spring Breakdown</em> is getting the short shrift, After the jump.</p>

<p>When I heard about the straight to DVD treatment, my first instinct was to cry sexism. I assumed that movie studios were not going to release the film because even after the moderate success of <em>Baby Mama</em>, they believe a woman-led comedy will not sell. But then I thought about it some more, and had another revelation: maybe I'm the one being sexist.</p>
<p>I was raging to a friend about <em>Spring Breakdown</em> not getting a proper release, and he said, "Maybe it's just not very good." That floored me. Maybe it's just. Not. Very. Good. That made me remember <a href="http://jezebel.com/5067246/bride-wars-an-insult-to-women-brain-cells#c8480067">a comment</a> made in the post I did about the <em>Bride Wars</em> trailer. If you'll recall, I found the trailer played to all the worst <em>Bridezilla</em>-ish stereotypes, and to that a commenter made some very good points, but then also a very bad one. "It might have gotten dumbed down and crappified, but there might actually be a good movie hiding behind the obnoxious trailer. Wouldn't be the first time. And, like <em>Baby Mama</em>, just the fact that it's a big budget comedy starring 2 women is a big big deal," the commenter argued. I was nodding my head in agreement, until this part: "Hopefully in a few years we'll have tons of good, bad, and mediocre female-driven comedies, but for now don't be so quick to shit on a movie written by, produced by, and starring women."</p>
<p>The idea that we should judge comedies written by, produced by, and starring women by a different rubric than comedies created by men is the worst kind of sexism &mdash; it's the sexism of <a href="http://jezebel.com/5054066/cnns-campbell-brown-turns-mccains-accusation-of-sexism-on-its-head">diminished expectations.</a></p>
<p>Melissa hasn't seen <em>Spring Breakdown</em>, but she's not positive it's a stinker, either, by anyone's rubric. Here's what she had to say:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>It's been done forever and I thought it was supposed to come out last spring around spring break which would have been perfect. So the fact that it's been sitting on the shelf for a while is not good news. Many movies, especially women's films have difficulty breaking into the market because there are just not enough theatres so even getting a DVD release is good for some people. This year films by Michelle Pfeiffer (the Amy Heckerling film- <em>I Could Never Be Your Woman</em>) and films that starred Meg Ryan and Diane Keaton have been dumped to DVD.</p>
<p>But those were smaller films. <em>Spring Breakdown</em> is from Warner Brothers which only really knows how to release guy centric blockbusters. I think that the could release it and still make $20 [million] because its a comedy and its got Amy who is almost as big a Tina now. I'm sure there are many political issues that I know nothing about and I don't know if the film is a piece of crap. <em>Baby Mama</em> was good, not great, in my book but made money (and would make so much more now).</p>
<p>With women's films you are screwed either way, first you don't want to release a bad movie starring and about women, especially a comedy because there are so few of those. I can just see the Judd Apatow fraternity rolling their eyes at a bad women's comedy. Why give Hollywood more ammunition to think we aren't a market?</p>
<p>But we don't know if it is bad. I see comedies differently than my male counterparts. Maybe I would think it was funny even though the suits at Warners or the test audiences in Las Vegas or some other place didn't. Who knows?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Melissa also notes that <em>Bride Wars</em> was not written and directed by women &mdash; it had women as co-writers (it was directed by Gary Winick and written by Casey Wilson, June Diane Raphael and Greg DePaul). However, she also thinks there should be room for the crappy chick flicks alongside the female-driven comedies and dramas. "We need all kinds of women's movies, just like we get all types of men's movies," Melissa stresses. "I just wish we had more good scripts and more opportunities to see women on screen. Is that too much to ask for in 2008?" No, no it's not.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0814331/">Spring Breakdown</a> [IMDB]<br>
<a href="http://www.womenandhollywood.blogspot.com/">Women & Hollywood</a></p>
<p>Earlier: <a href="http://jezebel.com/5067246/bride-wars-an-insult-to-women-brain-cells#c8480067"><em>Bride Wars</em> An Insult To Women, Brain Cells</a><br>
<a href="http://jezebel.com/gossip/living-dolls/the-stepfordization-of-hollywoods-comely-comediennes-313431.php">The Stepfordization Of Hollywood's Comely Comediennes</a></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://jezebel.com/5078624/spring-breakdown-reflects-a-break-down-for-women-in-comedies]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5078624]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[amy poehler]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Women & Hollywood]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Melissa Silverstein]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[parker posey]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rachel dratch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Spring Breakdown]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Women & Hollywood]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 06 Nov 2008 15:30:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jessica]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5078624&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Rachel Dratch Explains That Whole Demotion/Recasting Situation]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://www.defamer.com/assets/resources/2006/08/dratch-krakowski.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />Back in August, news emerged that Rachel Dratch was being, er, shifted ("demoted" is a bummer word, as you'll soon see) from her lead role on <em>30 Rock</em> into one where she'd <a href="http://www.defamer.com/hollywood/snl/debbie-downer-demoted-194661.php">play a "wide variety" of parts after producers decided to "scrap her character."</a> A couple of days after the initial announcement, we learned that her original character wasn't so much "scrapped" <a href="http://www.defamer.com/hollywood/rachel-dratch/debbie-downer-demoted-recast-195195.php">as "given to Jane Krakowski."</a> Dratch spoke to <em>NY Mag</em>'s Intelligencer column about <a href="http://www.defamer.com/hollywood/rachel-dratch/debbie-downer-demoted-recast-195195.php">how the unfortunate demoting/recasting thing went down:</a></p>
<blockquote><strong>What happened there?</strong> I think the big thing was&mdash;at least what they told me&mdash;that at first they wanted to have more comedy sketches in the show. Then they decided they weren't going to focus on the sketches, so they needed more of a sitcom actress, as opposed to a character actress.
<p><strong>That's very diplomatic.</strong><br>
Ha! Yes, I'm phrasing this all very nicely. That's the party line, at least&mdash;it's what I can tell my parents!</p>
<p><strong>Were you pissed?</strong><br>
Well, when Tina told me I was going to play different characters each show, I was actually psyched about it, because it sounded really unique. But then the media kind of ran with this "demotion" thing, so that was kind of a bummer. But whatever, I'm over it.</p>
</blockquote>
<br>
<blockquote><strong>How many episodes will you be in?</strong> Six, but that's a whole other thing. I was kind of like, Why do I only have six? But then I decided I shouldn't open my trap too much, so I just left it at that.
<p><strong>What do you think of Studio 60?</strong><br>
What's weird to me about it is that they're so serious about comedy. In the real comedy world, no one's like, "We've got to change people!"</p>
<p><strong>What's it like working with Alec Baldwin?</strong><br>
I haven't really worked with him that much, except for when I was starring in that first pilot. Cough, cough.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>It's probably smart that Dratch didn't rock the boat when she discovered she was only getting six episodes, lest she awaken to a story in the trades in which boss Lorne Michaels tries to sell her new part as "the unusual lady who's sometimes lurking in the background of scenes but never speaks," as a "far funnier role in which Rachel will really get to exercise her nonverbal comedy chops."</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://nymag.com/news/intelligencer/22836/">Rachel Rolls With It</a> [Intelligencer via <a href="http://www.tvgasm.com/archives/tvgasm_news/002938.php">TVGasm</a>]</li>
<li>Previously: <a href="http://www.defamer.com/hollywood/rachel-dratch/debbie-downer-demoted-recast-195195.php">Debbie Downer Demoted Recast</a> [Defamer]</li>
</ul>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://defamer.gawker.com/208011/rachel-dratch-explains-that-whole-demotionrecasting-situation]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-208011]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[rachel dratch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[30 rock]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nbc]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 16 Oct 2006 21:16:28 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=208011&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Debbie Downer Demoted Recast]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://www.defamer.com/assets/resources/2006/08/dratch-krakowski.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />On Wednesday, <a href="http://www.defamer.com/hollywood/snl/debbie-downer-demoted-194661.php"><em>SNL</em> mastermind and <em>30 Rock</em> executive producer put a positive spin</a> on the decision to demote star Rachel Dratch from a lead character to a "wide variety of roles," telling <em>Variety</em>, "The way it's been rewritten, it's a much funnier part." Of course, what he meant to say was, "The way it's been recast, it's a much blonder, more conventionally bimbonic part." <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr/television/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003019275">Reports today's <em>THR</em>:</a></p>
<blockquote>Jane Krakowski has joined the cast of NBC's upcoming comedy series "30 Rock."
<p>The former "Ally McBeal" actress will play the star of "The Girlie Show," a network variety show that serves as the backdrop for the workplace comedy, which stars Tina Fey and Alec Baldwin.</p>
<p>In the original pilot, Rachel Dratch played the star of "Girlie Show." She is now set to appear in multiple episodes, playing different characters.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Luckily, Dratch's stubborn refusal to address the network's note to make her character "more like the <em>Ally McBeal</em> secretary who lost weight and got all that plastic surgery after their show went off the air...what? She's available? Let's just get her," didn't cost her a job. In fact, she'll still play an integral part in the rejiggered cast, as <em>SNL</em> mentor Michaels and fellow EP Tina Fey have already supplemented Dratch's "cat wrangler" role from the pilot with appearances in future episodes as "spinster with dozens of cats," "crazy pet store clerk with unhealthy interest in cats," and a scene-stealing part as "woman with psychological disorder that causes her to groom herself with her tongue and shred furniture with her nails."</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr/television/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003019275">Krakowski to headline '30 Rock'</a> [THR]</li>
<li>Previously: <a href="http://www.defamer.com/hollywood/snl/debbie-downer-demoted-194661.php">Debbie Downer Demoted</a> [Defamer]</li>
</ul>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://defamer.gawker.com/195195/debbie-downer-demoted-recast]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-195195]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[rachel dratch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[30 rock]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[casting]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lorne michaels]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nbc]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 18 Aug 2006 12:44:32 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=195195&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Debbie Downer Demoted]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="debbie-downer.jpg" src="http://www.defamer.com/assets/resources/2006/08/debbie-downer.jpg" width="150" height="125" />We blame <a href="http://www.defamer.com/hollywood/top/comedy-central-publicists-grateful-for-andy-dicks-substance-abuse-history-194451.php">Andy Dick's wandering tongue</a> for making us miss yesterday's <em>Variety</em> story on Rachel Dratch's new role&mdash;or roles, as the case may be&mdash;on NBC's upcoming series for those who'll find <a href="http://defamer.com/hollywood/top/here-come-the-upfronts-aaron-sorkin-to-be-crowned-nbcs-savior-173840.php">Aaron Sorkin's 60-minute treatment</a> of the behind-the-scenes zaniness at <em>SNL</em> too demanding, the comparatively bite-sized <em>30 Rock</em>, but we still think it's worth pointing out even in its unacceptably stale, day-old form. (The internet news cycle is a cruel, unfeeling bitch.)  <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117948437?cs=1&s=h&p=0">Reports <em>Variety</em>:</a></p>

<blockquote>Dratch was originally tapped to play Jenna DeCarlo, an actress on "The Girlie Show" &mdash; the show-within-a-show on "30 Rock."

<p>But with the focus of "30 Rock" moving away from "The Girlie Show" and more toward the interaction among stars Tina Fey, Alec Baldwin and Tracy Morgan, the show's exec producers decided to scrap Dratch's character.</p>

<p>Instead, Dratch will appear in several episodes in a wide variety of roles. In the "30 Rock" opener, for example, she'll now appear as a cat wrangler (whose felines are needed for a sketch).</p>

<p>"Both Tina and I obviously adore Rachel, and we wanted to find a way in which we could go to her strength," said "SNL" creator Lorne Michaels, who is also an exec producer on "30 Rock." "The way it's been rewritten, it's a much funnier part."</blockquote></p>

<p>Leave it to legendary smooth-talker Lorne Michaels to sell the demotion, probably precipitated by a test audience comment card reading, "I think I find Debbie Downer too depressing to be on this show all the time, but I dunno. Tell her I hope her cat with AIDS is OK," as an exciting opportunity that frees up more time to go on auditions.</p>

<ul><li><a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117948437?cs=1&s=h&p=0">Inside Move: Dratch latched to multiple 'Rock' roles</a> [Variety]</li></ul>]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://defamer.gawker.com/194661/debbie-downer-demoted]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-194661]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[snl]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[30 rock]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lorne michaels]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rachel dratch]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 16 Aug 2006 14:54:17 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=194661&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		</channel>
</rss>
