<![CDATA[Gawker: defamer, msnbc]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: defamer, msnbc]]> http://gawker.com/tag/defamer/msnbc http://gawker.com/tag/defamer/msnbc <![CDATA[MSNBC Psychics Attribute Record Profits To Next 'Shrek' Film]]> MSNBC reports today that based on adjusted ticket prices, the record-breaking summer Hollywood just enjoyed at the box office in fact hosted 5 percent fewer moviegoers than 2007. Even The Dark Knight was subject to a particularly troubling reality check, with the as-yet-unproduced Shrek 4 surpassing its unprecedented money-making prowess. Now that is phenomenal. Next up: Watch Iron Man 3 shatter Harry Potter's impossible dream in 2009. [MSNBC]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5052594&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Movie Criticism Inches Closer to Death as Angry MSNBC Readers Lash Out]]> After last week's caustic conflagration among film critics, we've been closely monitoring the heart rates of reviewers all over the country as even more fall away from the ranks. This week saw the departure of Matt Zoller Seitz, the New York Times contributor and House Next Door founder who stepped away to pursue filmmaking full-time. We wish Seitz all the best, because judging by this series of damning reader retorts to a recent MSNBC survey of criticism, his timing couldn't possibly have been better:

I believe that movie criticism is not an elitist ability that only scholars can claim. There should be no need for movie history in determining a movie's worth. That is like saying that relatively this movie is awful, but if these others had not come along, it would be great. - Michael Walsh, Alpharetta, Ga.
I stopped listening to critics because too frequently they are criticizing the actor, not the film. For instance, "The Hammer" is one of the best movies I've ever seen, but many critics said the movie was awful because they seemed to dislike Adam Carolla. The opposite can be said of a Will Farrell [sic] movie (no offense to Will, but they're not all Old School). - Tim, Seattle, Wa.
I lost my attraction to movie critics, when it seems there was a glut. Online, magazines, local papers, everywhere you looked. And most of these were no better than my own opinion...which I trust much more than theirs anyway. - Chet, Avondale, Ariz.

We sensed Adam Carolla might eventually symbolize the tipping point in the enduring battle between critics and the hoi polloi — but in only his first starring role? The culture is indeed accelerating faster than we can keep up. In any case, our ambulance is gassed up for our next foray to the front lines, which should be ... this afternoon? Next hour? We hope not, but when even Chet from Avondale has lost his attraction, we know the clock is ticking.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=386136&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[The Morning After: Will Smith ScientologyGate Continues]]> Immediately after our exclusive story that executives at Sony attempted to squash an MSNBC.com story about Will Smith's alleged involvement with Scientology ran last night, Defamer received an email from the MSNBC.com news team stating the following: "We have now heard from Sony - furious that someone at msnbc.com is claiming that they asked us to kill the piece." Shortly thereafter, they updated their original story to include a denial that they had ever been contacted by Sony. As any faithful entertainment news follower is well aware, it is standard practice for media big guns to play the denial card as soon as any poor press hits. However, it is important to note that we here at Defamer are standing by the accuracy of our item; we will not be pressured into pulling it down.

While we have no idea whether or not Will Smith is a Scientologist (we have our theories, though), we do know that the prospect of the American public beginning to think that The Fresh Prince might be a Scientologist is enough to make the suits at Sony get nervous. After all, they are investing hundreds of millions of dollars into producing, releasing and marketing their big tentpole film for the summer, Hancock; the last thing they want or need are Anonymous protesters picketing the cineplexes over the July 4th weekend when the movie is released. With that in mind, we would just like to reiterate again that the story we ran yesterday was both fair and accurate, and that we will not be pulling it down.

PREVIOUSLY: Exclusive: Sony Execs Tried To Pressure MSNBC Into Killing Will Smith Scientology Story

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=369644&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Rosie O'Donnell Only Has Her Big, Haiku-ing Mouth To Blame For Killing Her MSNBC Deal]]> rosie-kaleid.jpgNo sooner had we reserved some room in our increasingly spacious DVR boxes (now occupied by season passes for Meerkat Manor, C-Span 3's America's Most Smartest Lobbiest, and not much else) for Rosie O'Donnell's upcoming MSNBC talk show, it turns out network executives have pulled out of the project after O'Donnell blabbed about the deal on her blog and at a Miami book signing. A new poem at Rosie.com explains what happened:

the show that never was

msnbc
one hour
live
following keith olbermann

we were close to a deal almost done i let it slip in miami causing panic on the studio end

well
what can u do

2day there is no deal
poof
my career as a pundit is over
b4 it began

just as well
i figure
everything happens for a reason
bashert - as we say

and on we go

"Bashert," of course, refers not to the Yiddish term meaning "it was meant to be," but rather to O'Donnell's mangling of British expat telejournalist Martin Bashir, whose surname she inexplicably evokes in times of great career disappointment. We have no doubt some other network will scoop up O'Donnell during these times of great need for unscripted schedule-fillers, however, finally allaying the deep sadness that comes with having so much nightmare to give, but no staff of producers and assistants to give it to.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=320578&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Rosie O'Donnell To Bring Her Patented Brand Of Loud And Crazy To MSNBC?]]> roisie-talk.jpgWith the writers' strike finally upon us, a nation of panicky couch potatoes nervously scanning their TV Guides in search of whatever available, non-scripted programming might prevent them from succumbing to an organ-seizing bout of TV withdrawal, we bring you a small measure of hope: According to the NY Times, Rosie O'Donnell is in talks to launch a nightly, primetime MSNBC talk show:

Under one scenario, Ms. O'Donnell would be given the 9 p.m. slot each weeknight on MSNBC, where she would go head-to-head with two heavyweights of cable talk: "Larry King Live" on CNN and "Hannity & Colmes" on Fox News.
Ms. O'Donnell alluded somewhat cryptically to a possible new job in a speech she gave at a book-signing on Sunday night in Miami, according to a report that appeared on a website, lyingonthebeach.com. A podcast on that site described Ms. O'Donnell as saying that she would soon begin competing against "the guy with the suspenders and the long, long face," an obvious reference to Mr. King.

The one sticking point to what could become a welcome addition to the talk show circuit remains O'Donnell's insistence that she appear behind the desk exclusively in the Queen Elizabeth I drag she recently donned on a Halloween visit to The Martha Stewart Show--her reasoning being that on Straight Shooters with Queen O'Donnell, the constipated, foghorn-like tones of her regal alter-ego would be the only sound capable of cutting through the cacophony of conservative voices currently clogging the political-spin airwaves.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=319253&view=rss&microfeed=true