<![CDATA[Gawker: defamer, liz smith]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: defamer, liz smith]]> http://gawker.com/tag/defamer/lizsmith http://gawker.com/tag/defamer/lizsmith <![CDATA[When Cupid Struck Thrice]]> Liz Smith's Valentine's Day Wish: a Lily/Jane three-way. [WowOwoW]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5150785&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Is Celebrity Gossip Really Dead This Time?]]>

According to one editor of a celebrity weekly, it's the "last trip to the buffet table," as Britney Spears' gurney-bound trip to the hospital signaled the end of dish. If that seems a bit ominous, it may be because there is a discernible lull in glossy-packaged brain candy. "There's nothing going on in celebrity land. There's no news, no gossip, no scandal," whined a TV producer to Liz Smith a few months back. "The Oscars showed how dull things are. People are only interested in politics." It's true. Reliable pop tarts no longer yield Google results like they once did (at left, Paris Hilton's trend chart, which shows a baseline traffic drop of about two-thirds). Here are a handful of theories about what's happened:

1. Politics trumps all. Hillary dodges phantom sniper fire, Obama defends/tolerates/repudiates his reverend, Bill fields a panicked 3 a.m. phone call from Gina Gershon, and McCain's inner beast is the only thing that can stop the Army's latest bioforce experiment gone haywire. Nicole Richie would have to actually get fat before she could stand to compete with Ashley Dupre.

2. Media boundaries are getting blurred. The Atlantic Monthly ran Britney on its cover in the same news cycle that had Us Weekly interview Obama and Camille Paglia. Then the New York Times paid almost as much attention to Heath Ledger's demise as, well, Gawker did. Things are not as they should be and we are all scared and confused.

3. Burn-out. What can Paris possibly do next except mutate into Lynne Cheney? And who cares?

4. Bad narrative. Here's Salon's Rebecca Traister: "Every once in a while a slam-bam terrific plot development — Pitt's abandonment of Aniston for Jolie was probably the apotheosis of celeb-weekly euphoria — would shake up the whole tableau, allowing the character descriptions to become fluid: stud could transform into cuckold; nice girl into tramp; a blood-obsessed, tattooed husband-stealer could even become a mother earth figure." So not only do their scripts lack cohesion, their lives do, too.

5. Gossip mongers are too old/out of the loop. Heidi Montag and Spencer Pratt sound like they'd get up to no good in an Evelyn Waugh novel. In fact, they're engaged, and she's on The Hills. Go figure.

All reasonable explanations for the current wasteland, but none really indicative of a Jann Wenner-led Rapture. The election will be over soon. Just because tabloids are being replaced by papers of record doesn't mean people aren't paying attention to the same content—it's just getting harder to track how they do it. And slam-bam terrific plot developments can't go extinct: there's always royalty to depend on for a good debauch with national consequences, and innocence will continue to be lost so long as its existence continues to be heralded.

Number 5 seems the likeliest bet. The next generation of sex tape stars and unwitting genitalia models is still in transition from the Disney Channel. But if Miley Cyrus is anything to go by, they (and the people who exploit them for a living) have a bright future yet. But can someone please get poor Spencer Pratt a Wikipedia entry?

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5016907&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[ Our tireless observation of the Liz Smith...]]> Our tireless observation of the Liz Smith Dirty Old Lady beat has yielded its second bounty in a week, with the lesbian gossip icon waxing fanciful about Nicole Kidman's glorious, supple, unaugmented breasts. "I do recall Nicole saying to me in the distant past that she always felt she wasn't well-endowed and she wished she were," Smith wrote today on her site Wowowow, directing readers to a photo of her and Kidman. "Does this look like a girl who needed breast surgery? No, this is Nicole all natural as the good Lord made her at the Vanity Fair party Oscar night. I admire a fine belle poitrine as much as anyone, but I can't stand these added-on half grapefruits that look as unnatural as can be. I have known Nicole for a long time now and her natural assets were quite good enough to start with." No fans of bolt-ons ourselves, we're happy to have at least this modest overlap in taste in common with our hero; really, for a while there we thought we'd lost her. [Via Queerty]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=372953&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Liz Smith Will Sleep With Anybody But Gossip Bloggers]]> In a candid interview befitting her 85 years of Earthly service, gossip matron Liz Smith holds forth in the Observer this week on subjects ranging from the good old docile days of entertainment reporting, her loyal ghostwriters "longtime assistants" Mary Jo and Dennis and the hippie scum that devastated her club-society utopia in the late '60s. Oh, and she's horny:

[Smith's memoirs] made waves because Ms. Smith had admitted to affairs with women, including longtime partner Iris Love, though it's also filled with tales of being hit on and dating and marrying men. "And then some Web site comes along and says, 'Liz Smith will sleep with anybody,'" she said. "And I thought this was funny, and great, but I was thinking, wow, how times have changed! Not very long ago you would never have printed that about somebody unless you had something on them. Because they would have sued you for it. ...
If they think an 85-year-old woman will sleep with anybody, well, then great! But on the other hand, I'm not dead yet, so who knows."

No sooner did we eagerly hop in the shower than we re-read the fine print in the form of Smith's criticism of gossip blogs and, by extension, her employers at the New York Post:

"[I]f I had any news, if I filed it, somebody would give it to the Internet. Frankly, I don't think most of it is worth keeping up with. ... You know, I used to write about entertainment from the '40s on, when there were really big stars. They were stars and they stayed stars, and they were really fascinating, whether you told the truth about them or you didn't."

And just like that, our dreams were dashed, leaving us hormonally atwitter with less-ambitious fantasies of Cindy Adams' come-hither stare coaxing us into a boudoir crammed with lavender candles and freshly groomed Yorkies. And don't even get us started about Nikki Finke.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=369654&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Quentin Tarantino, Okay, To Remake, Okay, "Faster Pussycat! Kill! Kill!", Okay]]> Citing no sources, Liz Smith is reporting in Variety today that Quentin Tarantino is planning to remake Russ Meyer's graduate thesis on the complex and intertwined relationship between heaving bosoms and ultraviolence, Faster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! For all we know, Liz might have forgotten to take her meds and made the whole thing up but, just this once, let's pretend that her sources aren't make-believe. Keeping that squarely in mind, the rumoured leads of the rumoured movie that QT is rumoured to be making "even raunchier" than the original are Eva Mendes, pride of the E! network Kim Kardashian and, gulp, Crossroads' Britney Spears. Hmmmm. That sounds positively terrible. We would've done it differently.

No offense to Eva, Kim or The Animal, but we're not sure any of the three can even come close to filling out Tura Santana's impressive brassiere. But then again, Quentin Tarantino has never been a breast man. Homeboy's got a foot fetish that makes Troy McClure's fish fetish look postively tame in comparison. Which is exactly why we cast extreme aspersion on the Britney casting note. After all, how could he possibly dig those dogs after all of the restroom germs they have picked up over the years? To save the movie, Defamer is advocating the casting of Lindsay Lohan (she's suitably trashy and available on the cheap ... and Liz Smith approved!), Sydney Tamiia Poiter (we loved her turn as Jungle Julia in "Death Proof") and Attack Of The Show's shiny-haired Olivia Munn. Now THERE'S a multi-culti cast and a movie that we can see ourselves getting excited to download off BitTorrent! Okay?

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=346753&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Guest Editor to Head Directly To Nearest Bar]]> unibomber.jpgTo put it plainly, these past three days have turned me into something of a Unabomber. I'm unwashed and somewhat slightly dazed. Meals became bananas and Trader Joe's cheesey puffs (Brit I totally get it now). And yet! And yet I feel like we've really accomplished something here. See, Dad! I did make something of my life! I've become a fill-in Defamerette! Like Liz Smith, but hairier! (Ed.: Factcheckers, verify that.)

Mucho thanks to everyone who sent me tips, stories, and input. Have a spookily spectacular weekend, and if you see me out, come up and say hi! I'll be dressed as a guy passed out on the Akbar bathroom floor.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=133984&view=rss&microfeed=true