<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gawker: Defamer, Gaffes]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gawker.com/tag/defamer/gaffes</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Gawker posts tagged 'defamer, gaffes']]></description>
			
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Who Wants To Be A 'Slumdog Millionaire' Distributor?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/defamer/2009/02/slumdog.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/defamer/2009/02/slumdog.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"  style="display:block;float:none;"/></a>Though <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged WARNER INDEPENDENT PICTURES" href="http://defamer.com/tag/warner-independent-pictures/">Warner Independent Pictures</a> no longer exists, it's comforting to know that WB's deeply boneheaded decision to let <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged FOX SEARCHLIGHT" href="http://defamer.com/tag/fox-searchlight/">Fox Searchlight</a> snatch <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged SLUMDOG MILLIONAIRE" href="http://defamer.com/tag/slumdog-millionaire/">Slumdog Millionaire</a></em> away is still immortalized on their <a href="http://wip.warnerbros.com/">website</a>. Click to enlarge.</p>

<ul>
<li><a href="http://blogs.indiewire.com/thelostboy/archives/slumdog_millionaire_coming_soon_from_warner_independent_pictures/">"Slumdog Millionaire," Coming Soon From Warner Independent Pictures!</a> [The Lost Boy]</li>
</ul>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://defamer.gawker.com/5151681/who-wants-to-be-a-slumdog-millionaire-distributor]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5151681]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[gaffes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fox searchlight]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[slumdog millionaire]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[warner independent pictures]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:55:21 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kyle Buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5151681&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Super Bowl Porn Watchers Offered Ten Bucks As Hazard Pay]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><script type="text/javascript">
newVideoPlayer("/superbowlporn.flv", 506, 423,"");
</script><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/stills/superbowlporn.flv.jpg"></a>We already thought that <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged SUPER BOWL" href="http://defamer.com/tag/super-bowl/">Super Bowl</a> watchers in Tucson were the luckiest fans ever, what with the <a href="http://defamer.com/5144454/defamer-rates-the-super-bowl-porn-that-accidentally-aired-in-arizona"><em>free porn</em> that briefly graced their televisions</a>. Now, they're getting paid to have watched it.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.eonline.com/uberblog/b82386_feds_planning_super_bowl_porn_probe.html">E!</a> brings word of Comcast's attempt to smooth out what some might deem a problem, but what we would prefer to call a pleasant (if flaccid) surprise:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>In a statement, the cable giant blamed the intrusion on a fiber-optics line operated by Cox Cable and that it was launching its own probe into what it called "an isolated malicious act." Comcast also promised a $10 credit to affected subscribers.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>What about us, Comcast? We've watched it, too&mdash;and that isn't even counting the damage we've surely incurred from watching <a href="http://defamer.com/5144595/defamer-rates-bruce-springsteens-halftime-3+d-super-bowl-ballstravaganza">Bruce Springsteen's crotch-attack</a> while we unfortunately still had our 3-D glasses on. We will accept our ten dollars in pennies, for the purpose of shenanigans.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.eonline.com/uberblog/b82386_feds_planning_super_bowl_porn_probe.html">Feds Planning Super Bowl Porn Probe?</a> [E!]</li>
</ul>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://defamer.gawker.com/5146670/super-bowl-porn-watchers-offered-ten-bucks-as-hazard-pay]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5146670]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[nsfw]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gaffes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[super bowl]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 04 Feb 2009 19:28:27 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kyle Buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5146670&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Defamer Rates The Super Bowl Porn That Accidentally Aired In Arizona]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><script type="text/javascript">
newVideoPlayer("/superbowlporn.flv", 506, 423,"");
</script><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/stills/superbowlporn.flv.jpg"></a>Sure, we've already told you what we thought of the <a href="http://defamer.com/5143967/defamer-rates-the-super-bowl-movie-spots">movie trailers that aired during yesterday's big game</a>. However, what was our take on the 30-second, NSFW porn clip that accidentally played in Tuscon, Arizona?</p>

<p>Yes, Comcast subscribers in the fair Arizona burg <a href="http://www.tmz.com/2009/02/02/porn-clip-penetrates-super-bowl-broadcast/">were treated to a Super Bowl wardrobe malfunction</a> in the waning moments of the game that offered a gender-reversed spin on Janet Jackson&mdash;<em>and how</em>. Naturally, the parents who let their children watch Bowl commercials where Danica Patrick takes a naked lesbian shower are outraged by this terrible, cup-less display of male genitals. Here at Defamer, we're notably more sanguine (hey, we deal with bare wangs&mdash;both <a href="http://defamer.com/5110400/scott-caan-gives-defamer-commenter-a-nsfw-christmas-present">celebrity</a> and <a href="http://defamer.com/5069295/watchmen-brings-its-full-cgi-power-to-bear-on-billy-crudups-exposed-wang">cerulean</a>&mdash;for a living).<br>
Execution: 3 Anticipation: 7</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.tmz.com/2009/02/02/porn-clip-penetrates-super-bowl-broadcast/">Porn Clip Penetrates Super Bowl Broadcast</a> [TMZ]</li>
</ul>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://defamer.gawker.com/5144454/defamer-rates-the-super-bowl-porn-that-accidentally-aired-in-arizona]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5144454]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[nsfw]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gaffes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[super bowl]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 02 Feb 2009 12:20:25 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kyle Buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5144454&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Paris Hilton Certain That Reality TV Chef Is British Prime Minister]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/1/2009/01/thumb160x_paris_02.JPG" class="left image158" width="158" />Thank goodness <a class="autolink" rel="nofollow" title="Click here to read more posts tagged PARIS HILTON" href="http://defamer.com/tag/paris-hilton/">Paris Hilton</a>'s <a href="http://defamer.com/5033536/in-new-video-paris-hilton-rebukes-mccain-successfully-pronounces-big-words">nascent presidential campaign</a> never took off: not only would she have worn Kitson to all the presidential balls, but she thinks the British prime minister is someone else entirely.</p>

<p>In the U.K. to promote the British version of her <em>BFF</em> series, Hilton immediately stuck her foot in her mouth (only the second most famous object to grace that orifice). <em>The Sun's</em> Colin Robertson was witness to the cultural carnage, in which Hilton mistook Prime Minister Gordon Brown for the host of <em><a class="autolink" rel="nofollow" title="Click here to read more posts tagged KITCHEN NIGHTMARES" href="http://defamer.com/tag/kitchen-nightmares/">Kitchen Nightmares</a></em>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>She descended on London and told me: “I love Britain. London is my favourite city in the world.” But when asked if she knew our PM, she replied, “Yes, it’s <a class="autolink" rel="nofollow" title="Click here to read more posts tagged GORDON RAMSAY" href="http://defamer.com/tag/gordon-ramsay/">Gordon Ramsay</a>, isn’t it?"</p>
<p>Her knowledge of British drinking habits was equally ropey. She confessed: “No, I’ve not heard of a pint — what it that? Is it beer?”</p>
<p>And in the show she tells one hopeful she is unfamiliar with the girl’s home county, inquiring: “Essex? What’s that?”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Though we fear (pray?) Hilton's strain of dimness may thwart her attempts to re-enter the U.S., at least she can use her celebrity to get in touch with President Padma. Who, after all, can forget our new leader's inspiring message to young people everwhere: "Please pack your knives and go."</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/showbiz/tv/article2179224.ece?OTC-RSS&ATTR=TV">Paris: PM is Gordon Ramsay, right?</a> [The Sun]</li>
</ul>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://defamer.gawker.com/5141177/paris-hilton-certain-that-reality-tv-chef-is-british-prime-minister]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5141177]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[gaffes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gordon ramsay]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hell's kitchen]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[kitchen nightmares]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[paris hilton]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:39:12 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kyle Buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5141177&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA['Us Weekly' Puts A Sparkly Exclamation Point On Tom Cruise's Grief]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><script type="text/javascript">
newVideoPlayer("/US_Cruise_Ding.flv", undefined, NaN,"");
</script>Tom Cruise will be appearing on <em>The View</em> tomorrow to discuss the death of Jett Travolta, and TMZ's got a <a href="http://www.tmz.com/2009/01/08/tom-on-jetts-death-horrific/">full advance video clip</a>. Why, then, are we pointing you toward <a href="http://www.usmagazine.com/news/tom-cruise-jett-travoltas-death-is-just-horrific"><em>Us Weekly's</em> coverage</a>?</p>

<p>Mainly because as an overcome, emotional Cruise fumbles for words while addressing the tragedy, <em>Us Weekly</em> prematurely ends their video clip with a sparkly ID bumper that is <em>deeply</em> inappropriate, given the circumstances. We'd encourage them to take a cue from <em>24</em>, which ends its most tragic episodes with a respectfully silent clock, but we admire the sheer, campy chutzpah it took to watch this wrenching video and decide, "Needs more whimsy!"</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.usmagazine.com/news/tom-cruise-jett-travoltas-death-is-just-horrific">VIDEO: Tom Cruise: Jett Travolta's Death Is "Horrific"</a> [Us]</li>
</ul>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://defamer.gawker.com/5126717/us-weekly-puts-a-sparkly-exclamation-point-on-tom-cruises-grief]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5126717]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[gaffes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jett travolta]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[the view]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tom cruise]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 08 Jan 2009 17:16:15 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kyle Buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5126717&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Mary-Kate Olsen Mistakes Nationwide Recession For Inexpensive Shopping Opportunity]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/1/2008/12/340x_custom_1229974150321_medium_markykate.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />For some, the country's economic dire straits mean job loss, financial cutbacks, and tough choices. Mary-Kate Olsen, however, believes that "the recession" is a hip new chain store akin to Fred Segal.</p>

<p><em><a href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/12222008/gossip/pagesix/recession_fan_145346.htm">Page Six</a></em> has the scoop:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>A <em>Page Six</em> spy, who recently shared an elevator at Barneys with the diminutive actress, reports Olsen was excited about all the discounted merchandise for the taking. "It's really sad - the recession is everywhere. But at least they are having good sales," said Olsen, who pointed to her hat. "That's where I got this! The recession!"</p>
</blockquote>
<p>While we congratulate the empathetic Olsen on finding a silver lining, we're appalled that she still hasn't discovered the hottest boutique in town, <a href="http://defamer.com/5111544/spielberg-soaked-in-madoff+brand-ponzi-dipping-sauce">Madoff</a>. The expense may be steep there, but if the actress forks over as much as she can, we have a feeling that the payoff will be priceless.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.nypost.com/seven/12222008/gossip/pagesix/recession_fan_145346.htm">RECESSION FAN</a> [NY Post]</li>
</ul>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://defamer.gawker.com/5115915/mary+kate-olsen-mistakes-nationwide-recession-for-inexpensive-shopping-opportunity]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5115915]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[gaffes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mary-kate olsen]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 22 Dec 2008 14:53:11 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kyle Buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5115915&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[CBS Now Just Taunting Macaulay Culkin, Defamer]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/1/2008/12/340x_maccy_01.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;"/>When we noticed today that CBS 2 had made a <a href="http://defamer.com/5107814/cbs-uses-classy-photo-choice-to-imply-macaulay-culkin-killed-his-sister">completely inappropriate photo choice</a> for its story on the death of Macaulay Culkin's sister, we figured they'd eventually change it. But is this an improvement?</p>

<p>The initial mugshot seemed to heavily imply Culkin's responsibility for the death, and while the new picture removes some of that taint, he now seems weirdly happy and satisfied. Again, we're glad they didn't use <a href="http://www.babble.com/CS/blogs/strollerderby/2008/08/16-22/home%20alone.jpg">this photo</a>, but we fear now that they're only getting warmed up. Guys, a neutral or frowning picture of Macaulay is not hard to find &mdash; <a href="http://images.google.com/">Google Image Search</a> is your friend! Let's just be happy that <a href="http://defamer.com/5044855/90210-meet-the-new-brenda-who-cant-stop-smiling">Shenae Grimes</a> hasn't had to suffer this insult upon injury today, and claim that as our tenuous silver lining.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://cbs2.com/">CBS 2</a></li>
</ul>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://defamer.gawker.com/5108013/cbs-now-just-taunting-macaulay-culkin-defamer]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5108013]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[gaffes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Dakota Culkin]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[kcbs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macaulay culkin]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 11 Dec 2008 20:46:31 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kyle Buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5108013&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[CBS Uses Classy Photo Choice to Imply Macaulay Culkin Killed His Sister]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/1/2008/12/340x_maccy.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display:block;"/>Let it never be said that we don't understand the value of a click-through (witness our new look!). But, uh, KCBS 2, can we talk for a sec?</p>

<p>Certainly, we can understand running with a picture of Macaulay Culkin to illustrate the death of his sister Dakota; after all, Macaulay is the most famous sibling and therefore the one that readers will hook into. But...<em>that</em> picture? Surely you know what using Macaulay's mugshot is suggesting to your readers, don't you? And it's not, "Oh, remember when Macaulay got arrested in 2004 for marijuana possession in Oklahoma City?"</p>
<p>Here's the <a href="http://apimages.ap.org/Default.aspx?sh=10">Associated Press photo site</a>. Put an account on your Christmas wishlist! Still, we'll reluctantly give you one thing: at least you didn't use <a href="http://www.babble.com/CS/blogs/strollerderby/2008/08/16-22/home%20alone.jpg">this</a>.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://cbs2.com/">CBS 2</a></li>
</ul>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://defamer.gawker.com/5107814/cbs-uses-classy-photo-choice-to-imply-macaulay-culkin-killed-his-sister]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5107814]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[gaffes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Dakota Culkin]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[kcbs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macaulay culkin]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 11 Dec 2008 16:38:23 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kyle Buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5107814&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Martin Bashir's 'Boner' Video]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><script type="text/javascript">
newVideoPlayer("/Bashir_Talks_Babes_2.flv", 506, 423,"");
</script><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/stills/Bashir_Talks_Babes_2.flv.jpg"></a>The transcript was bad; the video is excruciating. <i>Nightline</i> host <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #martinbashir" href="http://gawker.com/tag/martinbashir/">Martin Bashir</a>&mdash;famous for interviewing Princess Diana and Michael Jackson&mdash;made some fratty/middle-aged comments <a href="http://gawker.com/5032116/martin-bashir-tells-crowd-about-his-boner">last week</a> when he was chosen to be the keynote speaker at the Asian American Journalist's Association: "I've never been in an environment with so many beautiful Asian babes in my life. In fact, I'm mightily relieved that the podium covers me from the waist downwards. I've been having trouble all evening." He also creeped out his ABC colleague, <i>20/20</i>'s Juju Chang. He's since said he's sorry (sorry he got caught!) Now that we have the video (<a href="http://www.aaja.org/features/articles/2008_08_03_01/">full video from AAJA here</a>), which will haunt him via the Internet for years, he'll be <i>really</i> sorry.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://defamer.gawker.com/5034412/martin-bashirs-boner-video]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5034412]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[<strike>Exclusive</strike>]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gaffes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[martin bashir]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 07 Aug 2008 15:26:21 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheila]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5034412&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		</channel>
</rss>
