<![CDATA[Gawker: defamer, announcements]]> http://tags.gawker.com/assets/base/img/thumbs140x140/gawker.com.png <![CDATA[Gawker: defamer, announcements]]> http://gawker.com/tag/defamer/announcements http://gawker.com/tag/defamer/announcements <![CDATA[Anderson Cooper Comes Out of the Closet... About His 'Real Housewives' Addiction]]> "Honey, I don't even know where to begin with NeNe!" says Anderson Cooper, and we don't know where to begin with this clip, in which the newsman throws some serious shade on Ellen DeGeneres for not watching his favorite guilty pleasure, Real Housewives of Atlanta. Yes, when not globetrotting in Kosovo, interviewing Katrina evacuees, or organizing his closet of medium-size black t-shirts (by frequency of use, natch), the Coop is a reality television devotee. Still, even his love for Dancing with the Stars is eclipsed by his obsession with Real Housewives. Something's gotta fill the void until season two of Living Lohan! Clip above.

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5076417&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Good morning to you, the loyal Defamer reader....]]> Good morning to you, the loyal Defamer reader. A few quick administrative notes to share with you on this Monday morning. First off, Seth is taking a well-deserved vacation this week; while we're all going to miss him, we're happy to announce that Amy Kaufman has agreed to join us for the next two days in a guest blogger capacity. For those of you that are unfamiliar, here's a quick bio.

Amy is a Bostonian-turned-Angeleno who graduated from the journalism program at the University of Southern California last spring. During college, where she was one of the rare pale-skinned brunettes, she had a column in the school newspaper entitled “Fish of Out Water” in which she wrote about finding her way in L.A. She has written for the Los Angeles Times, where she interviewed Sting and penned profiles of the likes of Mandy Moore and Kat Von D. She recently finished a stint at the Wall Street Journal, covering topics including a potential California state ban on helium-filled foil balloons (you know, the ones shaped like Hannah Montana sold at hospital gift shops) to the trials of the modern-day ‘indie’ musician.

Please give Amy a warm welcome! One last thing while we've got your undivided attention. You may have heard this already, but after months of hard work and dedication on the part of our design and tech department, we are introducing — wait for it — threaded comments sometime later today. What does that mean, exactly? Follow us after the jump for a long-winded explanation. MORE >>

What's threaded commenting?

Threading is a way to make comments read more like conversations instead of a bunch of disconnected single replies. Now, when someone says something interesting enough to get replies from other readers, all those replies will appear directly below the original comment. Each of these blocks is called a "thread"—kind of like in Gmail.

The first comment in a thread will have a few distinguishing features, among them, the number of replies in the thread along with the time of the most recent reply.

Click the arrow on the lower right side to open a reply input box directly underneath the comment—there's no need to scroll all the way to the bottom of the page to reply.

Once your reply publishes, you'll notice that like in an IM conversation, your avatar will appear on the right.

Replies to replies—sometimes known as second or third (or fourth) level replies—will not be indented as is the custom in most forums. Instead, second and third level replies will be collapsed.

What happens when you reply to a reply? Why aren't threads indented like in most tech forums, like Digg?

Replies to replies—sometimes known as second or third (or fourth) level replies—will not be indented as is the custom in most forums. Instead, the avatar will switch sides again—like in an IM conversation. All even numbered nested replies (second, fourth, etc.) will appear on the left side, while odd numbered replies will be on the right. Second and third level replies will also be collapsed.

Are threads still displayed in chronological order?

Each conversation will be displayed in chronological order. But organization of the conversations overall will be displayed based on popularity. The most popular conversations will migrate to the top. The most recent comment that has no replies will appear on top for 15 minutes before being filtered down. If a more active conversation receives a reply within those 15 minutes, that conversation will overtake the stand-alone comment.

Where did the plus and minus go?

The plus and minus, which was used to friend or un-friend a fellow commenter, has been replaced by a heart. Your friends will show up with a red heart, and the rest are empty.

What's the deal with the star again?

Star commenters were readers who have 25 or more followers, or were designated as stars by a comments admin. With the introduction of threading, the number of followers required to attain star is increasing to 40. Commenter admins also hand out stars to commenters who may not have 40 followers, but illuminate our lives with flashes of brilliance.

Ack, change scares me. Is there a way to view comments the "old-fashioned" way?

You can switch to the old style comments layout by clicking the "classic view" link in the comments bar at the top of the threads.

More info when it goes live at 11am!

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5053119&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Announcements]]> Hey, you like reading email, don't you? It sure beats walking out to the mailbox once a day, doesn't it? Well, if you like email as much as we like email, have we got an offer for you! We're excited to announce that Defamer has launched a once-a-week email alert that will enable you to receive a simple communique that contains a brief summary and links to our Top 5 Most Popular Stories of the week. The email only goes out 1x per week, on Fridays, so we promise that your inbox will not be deluged with Defamer spam. Another bonus for signing up? In the case of BREAKING! and/or DEVELOPING! news, we'll alert you straightaway via the same channel. We are applying the Spiderman Principle of "with great power comes great responsibility" to our email communications, so if you see a Defamer email sitting in your inbox, you'll know its totally worthwhile (unfortch, the same could not be said for Spiderman 3). If you would like to sign up, simply enter your email address into the box that's sitting in the left-hand sidebar underneath the hed "Subscribe To Defamer." Give it a whirl, won't ya?

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=5017619&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[We've got two quick announcements to lead...]]> We've got two quick announcements to lead the day. And no, neither of them have anything to do with April Fool's Day (we tend to defer to Ashton Kutcher when it comes to pranking, punk'ing and pap'ing). First things first, Seth is taking a much deserved and long overdue vacation and will be gone for the next two weeks. While we're not entirely sure where he went, we have it on good authority that he's gone south of the equator in an attempt to infiltrate X17's secret island paparazzo boot camp. Fingers crossed that all of his covert training paid off!

To that end, we have enlisted long-time Friend Of Defamer Megan Lynn to fill in as a guest blogger for the next two days. Megan has been making your links work in the Trade Roundup since this party started way back in Aught Four. In the other 23 hours and 40 minutes of her days since then, she's assisted no less than six television execs, producers, writers and/or assholes with serious Napoleon conflicts, compiled the world's largest private collection of Dick Cheney photos at her blog, Overeducated and Underemployed (a title which has, since chosen, become less and less true), was a staff writer at Usmagazine.com and, until its fresh and untimely demise, wrote for PageSix.com. Sigh. That's what she gets for putting her trust in Rupert. Again.

Please give Megan a warm welcome; now, on with the show!

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=374620&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Defamer Welcomes Stu VanAirsdale As The Newest Member Of Our Editorial Team]]> We'd love to begin this lovely Monday morning not by pounding a pitcher full of green beer (that will follow in a few minutes), but rather by introducing the newest member of the Defamer editorial team. We are thrilled to announce that S.T. VanAirsdale is joining our ranks in the position of Senior Editor, where he will be helping us round out our coverage of the movie industry that we all love and loathe in equal measure. Stu is a both a well-respected and well-heeled veteran of the world of film criticism and industry analysis, having his work published by Vanity Fair, The New York Times, New York Magazine and, of course, the The Reeler. We are tremendously excited to have both his biting wit and extensive experience on the team, and we are confident that you will quickly grow to love him as much as we do. So, with that, everyone please give a warm welcome to Stu! Now, on with the show...

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=368713&view=rss&microfeed=true
<![CDATA[Who Knew Jalopnik Would Be A Big Bright Shining Interweb Movie Star?]]> Wow, we're totally in the bright lights now. Looks like the database of all things movies on the intertubes, IMDB, has decided we're worthy enough to be a star — a bright and shining star. True, it's at the bottom of their home page in the "Hit List" section, but when you're like us — and lacking in that "one special thing" — you've got to start somewhere, right? I mean, first step's IMDB's link-love section and then next thing you know, we're getting top billing as an extra in the next "Fast & The Furious" movie. Come to think of it, maybe the bright lights aren't the place to be.

[IMDB]

Related:
Yes, Children, We Still Do Not Know Jay Leno [internal]

]]>
http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&postId=226339&view=rss&microfeed=true