<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gawker: Fox]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gawker.com/tag/fox</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Gawker posts tagged 'fox']]></description>
			
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Fox Declares Christmas Miracle as Volcano Threatens Philippines]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><script type="text/javascript">
newVideoPlayer("/Fox_Volcano_Gawk.flv", 500, 375,"");
</script>Do you need context, for this? A Fox correspondent says Philippines is covered in ash, because of a volcano, so "in a way they're having a <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #whitechristmas" href="http://gawker.com/tag/whitechristmas/">white christmas</a>." So nice of Jesus to blanket them in His loving sulfur!</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5432149/fox-declares-christmas-miracle-as-volcano-threatens-philippines]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5432149]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[videuhoh]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[christmas]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[disasters]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fox news]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[natural disasters]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[volcanoes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[white christmas]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:07:27 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pareene]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5432149&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Fox to Beck: Maybe You Should Cut Back on the Gold a Little?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2009/12/goldline.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2009/12/500x_goldline.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Something's gone terribly wrong at <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #foxnews" href="http://gawker.com/tag/foxnews/">Fox News</a>&mdash;they keep responding to criticism as if it's valid! Someone at the network <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/14/business/media/14beck.html?_r=2&src=twt&twt=NYTimesAd">sent a letter to Glenn Beck</a> wondering why he's always constantly <a href="http://gawker.com/5420721/glenn-beck-advertiser-pundits-say-what-you-pay-them-to-say">shilling for gold.</a></p>
<p>Recently, Fox has begun actually <a href="http://gawker.com/5408405/fox-news-to-fire-itself">acknowledging mistakes</a>, responding to <a href="http://gawker.com/5408855/fox-news-just-cant-stop-responding-to-jon-stewarts-comedy-program">satirical criticism</a>, apologizing <a href="http://gawker.com/5408608/fox-news-apologizes--again&mdash;for-being-fake">for errors,</a>, and even <a href="http://gawker.com/5411282/fox-news-to-go-error+free-in-2010">promising to stop lying all the time.</a> It's weird! We're a little worried about them!</p>
<p>Beck's gold scam&mdash;he constantly tells his audience to invest in gold because America is going to collapse and he is also coincidentally a paid spokesman for a company that sells gold at massively inflated prices&mdash; was revealed in <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1209/30231.html">a surprisingly journalismy story</a> in <i>Politico</i> that led to <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/12/11/stewart-catches-glenn-bec_n_388362.html">a <i>Daily Show</i> segment</a> (and, yes, a Gawker post; that was most likely the difference-maker here).</p>
<p>Then the network's legal department sent Beck a letter asking him just what he does for Goldline, exactly. Because technically, on-air talent at Fox is prohibited from "endorsing products or serving as a product spokesperson."</p>
<p>But don't worry! If it sounds like Fox is going to crack down on an obvious violation of their own crippled ethics policies, they are actually just covering their asses and then <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/14/business/media/14beck.html?_r=2&src=twt&twt=NYTimesAd">telling the <i>Times</i> that they'd covered their asses</a>. Because while Beck was named as a "paid spokesman" of Goldline on their website just last week, which would violate Fox's policy, they hastily renamed Beck a "radio sponsor" instead, so everything is fine.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"They sent back word that he is not a paid spokesman," [Fox exec Joel] Cheatwood said, adding that it would be "problematic without question" if Mr. Beck did have a position as a paid spokesman for a product.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>So they are aware of his unethical behavior, and they sent him a letter about it, but no one is asking anyone to do anything differently, the end.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5425923/fox-to-beck-maybe-you-should-cut-back-on-the-gold-a-little]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5425923]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[gold]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[daily show]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fox news]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[glenn beck]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gooooollllddd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[scams]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 14 Dec 2009 10:21:41 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pareene]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5425923&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[How Reality TV Took the Shame Out of Pornography]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gawker/2009/12/6a00d8341ca4b653ef0120a741aacc970b-450wi.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Look everyone! This guy who is going to be a contestant on upcoming reality show <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #conveyorbeltoflove" href="http://gawker.com/tag/conveyorbeltoflove/">Conveyor Belt of Love</a></em> was in gay porn! Ugh, this has become so commonplace it's boring. Now these genres go hand in hand.</p>
<p>Maybe it's the mainstreaming of porn culture or the fact that plenty of our reality show stars have had sex tapes (think Paris Hilton and Kim Kardashian), but now people are free to go from one genre to the other without impunity.</p>
<p>The latest is porn star Kekoa Nalu who <a href="http://blog.unzipped.net/2009/12/surprise-abcs-conveyor-belt-of-love-contestant-a-gay-porn-star.html">gay porn mag Unzipped</a> [It's not entirely SFW, but there's nothing below the belt] reveals he was a cover model and did a few scenes on RandyBlue.com, a gay pornographic website with which I am completely unfamiliar. Unzipped also has a link to action shots, if you're into that sort of thing.</p>
<p>Kekoa is going to be one of the men sliding by on the <em>Conveyor Belt of Love</em> (trailer is at the bottom of the post), who have only 60 seconds to impress a panel of ladies. The worst thing about this isn't that he did porn, but that these women have been reduced to this sad, sad show.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/2009/12/custom_1260564444336_emmanuel-delcour-chef-academy.jpg" width="160" height="213">This comes right on the heels of everyone <a href="http://www.theinsider.com/news/3074800_Chef_Academy_s_Emmanuel_DelCour_is_porn_star_Jean_Val_Jean">finding out</a> that Emmanuel DelCour, one of the contestants currently on Bravo's <em>Chef Academy</em>, is also straight porn star Jean Valjean. Well, naming yourself after a character in a musical isn't the straightest choice, but there is footage of him fucking ladies.<br clear="all"></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/2009/12/custom_1260564358645_frenchiedavis2.jpg" width="160" height="196">At one time, this might have been a fireable offense. In 2003, Frenchie Davis (pictured) was kicked off the second season of <em>American Idol</em> when topless pictures of her were unearthed. In 2007 and 2008, when similar pictures of contestants Antonella Barba and David Hernandez floated to the surface, they were allowed to keep competing. It looks like in four years time, these things ceased to matter.</p>
<p>That's the thing about porn, it is forever and if a person who does it receives any smidgen of notoriety&mdash;from a reality show to being in the news&mdash;everyone's going to find out about it. But it won't cost you your shot at fully clothed humiliation. In 2008, <em>Big Brother</em> found out that one of the contestants on the show had an <a href="http://www.realityblurred.com/realitytv/archives/big_brother_9/2008_Feb_19_james_more_porn">extensive career in gay porn</a>, and he not only got to stay in the house but also continued hooking up with one of the female contestants. We wonder what she had to say when she got home and googled him.</p>
<p>We're all still into the prurient details, but does anyone really care about a porn past anymore? Earlier this year, another dating show contestant, "Danger" on <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #fortheloveofrayj" href="http://gawker.com/tag/fortheloveofrayj/">For the Love of Ray J</a></em> did some nude modeling [<a href="http://fleshbot.com/5160321/is-a-former-porn-model-fighting-for-the-love-of-ray-j">NSFW</a>, unless you work at a naked modeling agency], but it didn't hurt her on the show. We got that news from our friends at Fleshbot, who also tell us that two <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #soyouthinkyoucandance" href="http://gawker.com/tag/soyouthinkyoucandance/">So You Think You Can Dance</a></em> contestants have some nude snaps without penalty [<a href="http://gay.fleshbot.com/5323447/are-the-so-you-think-you-can-dance-contestants-posting-pictures-on-guys-with-iphones/gallery/">NSFW</a>, unless you work at a clothing optional gay guest house].</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/2009/12/custom_1260564576835_girls-next-door-tv-03.jpg" width="160" height="191">And it goes both ways. Just look at the entire oevure of E!'s <a href="http://www.eonline.com/on/shows/girlsnextdoor/"><em>The Girls Next Door</em></a>, a reality show about <em>Playboy</em> models (pictured), or HBO's classic <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cathouse:_The_Series"><em>Cathouse</em></a>, a hard-core reality show about a brothel. And former reality stars can then become porn actors, just like Marco Rivera, a loser on VH1's <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #ilovenewyork" href="http://gawker.com/tag/ilovenewyork/">I Love New York</a></em>, who is now having sex with women on gay websites (don't try to figure it out. There are too many layers, and your head will explode).</p>
<p>So, yes, it's mildly entertaining to find out someone on television has been getting naked for money before a camera, but it's not really news anymore. What we have instead is porn and <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #realitytv" href="http://gawker.com/tag/realitytv/">reality TV</a> sealed in a marriage of convenience as the two things that America loves more than anything, but doesn't want anyone to know they watch.</p>
<p><object id="flashObj" width="486" height="412" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=9,0,47,0"><param name="movie" value="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9/6555681001?isVid=1&publisherID=769341148">
<param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF">
<param name="flashVars" value="videoId=55700030001&playerID=6555681001&domain=embed&">
<param name="base" value="http://admin.brightcove.com">
<param name="seamlesstabbing" value="false">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<param name="swLiveConnect" value="true">
<param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always">
<embed src="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9/6555681001?isVid=1&publisherID=769341148" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashvars="videoId=55700030001&playerID=6555681001&domain=embed&" base="http://admin.brightcove.com" name="flashObj" width="486" height="412" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" swliveconnect="true" allowscriptaccess="always" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed></object></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5424512/how-reality-tv-took-the-shame-out-of-pornography]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5424512]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[porn again]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[abc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Conveyor Belt of Love]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[e!]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[for the love of ray j]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[girls next door]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[i love new york]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[porn]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[reality tv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[so you think you can dance]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[vh1]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:26:36 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Moylan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5424512&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Bow Before the Comcast-NBC Universal Megalith]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gawker/2009/12/comcast_01.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Actually save it for when the deal actually goes through. But that time has moved closer now that Comcast announced a $30 billion deal to take over <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #nbcuniversal" href="http://gawker.com/tag/nbcuniversal/">NBC Universal</a> from GE. The next big question: Are regulators going to flip?</p>
<p>If the deal goes through, Comcast-NBC Universal will be an entertainment squid with tentacles wrapped around cable channels&mdash;USA, Syfy, Bravo, E, NBC and more&mdash;websites, theme parks and a film studio. Now it's up to regulators to determine if it will be a blood-sucking vampire squid or a fun, benevolent squid. In order to soothe anti-trust fears, Comcast has promised that they won't pull NBC content from competing providers like DirecTV. But they <em>would</em> say that, wouldn't they? [<a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-ct-comcast4-2009dec04,0,7144558.story?page=2">LAT</a>]</p>
<p>•Fox is fighting back at rumors that <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #jamescameron" href="http://gawker.com/tag/jamescameron/">James Cameron</a>'s "Avatar" will be the most expensive movie ever made with a budget more than half a billion dollars. No, they say, it will cost a measly $400 million. And, according to The Wrap, this should put it in reach of actually making a profit. As long it doesn't make people throw up. [<a href="http://www.thewrap.com/article/true-cost-and-consequences-avatar-11206?page=2">The Wrap</a>]</p>
<p>•A 46 year-old Christmas special beat out everything on TV in the ratings yesterday: the classic stop-animation "Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer" drew 10.7 million viewers compared to second-place "<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #soyouthinkyoucandance" href="http://gawker.com/tag/soyouthinkyoucandance/">So You Think You Can Dance</a>" at 6.3 million. Why do networks even make new shows anymore? [<a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118012126.html?categoryid=14&cs=1&ref=verttv">Variety</a>]</p>
<p>•Directors get no respect: Director <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #peterjackson" href="http://gawker.com/tag/peterjackson/">Peter Jackson</a> ("Lord of the Rings") complained to the Carpetbagger that, while the Academy Awards' best film category has been expanded to 10, there are still only five best director slots. Which means five movies were awesome despite having terrible directors? [<a href="http://carpetbagger.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/03/second-class-treatment-for-directors/">Carbetbagger</a>]</p>
<p>•This one goes out to anyone who thinks Hollywood is filled with smut-peddling sleazeballs: According to the FTC, the entertainment industry engages in "explicit and pervasive targeting of young children" for violent and sexual films rated PG-13 or even&mdash;gasp&mdash;R. [<a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/03/new-report-on-entertainment-industry-marketing-to-children/">NYT</a>]</p>
<p>•Here's a funny fact: The infamous Mexican revolutionary <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #panchovilla" href="http://gawker.com/tag/panchovilla/">Pancho Villa</a>'s last words were "Don't let it end like this. Tell them I said something." Maybe <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #johnnydepp" href="http://gawker.com/tag/johnnydepp/">Johnny Depp</a> will say these lines when he possibly stars in the biopic "Seven Friends of Pancho Villa and the Woman With Six Fingers." [<a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118012121.html?categoryid=13&cs=1&ref=vertfilm">Variety</a>]</p>
<p>•Nobody in America cares about soccer&mdash;but what if it's shown in 3D!? FIFA has announced that the 2010 World Cup in South Africa will be broadcast in 3D. [<a href="http://www.thewrap.com/article/sony-puts-world-cup-3d-11166">The Wrap</a>]</p>
<p>•This is exciting: The producers of the Herzog film "Bad Lieutenant," have optioned the rights to <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #jonathanlethem" href="http://gawker.com/tag/jonathanlethem/">Jonathan Lethem</a>'s novel "Gun, With Occasional Music." It's a sci-fi noir, nerds. Goodnight! [<a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/film/news/e3i63d9141b5e726371763c031a9d8eb628">THR</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5418662/bow-before-the-comcast+nbc-universal-megalith]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5418662]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[trade roundup]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[avatar]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[comcast]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ftc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[james cameron]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[johnny depp]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jonathan lethem]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nbc universal]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[oscars]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Pancho Villa]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[peter jackson]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reinder]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[so you think you can dance]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Warner Herzog]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 04 Dec 2009 01:09:55 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adrian Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5418662&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[In Which Fox Edits Lies into the News]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2009/11/500x_fox.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Here's how an accurate-but-slanted story becomes an outright lie: the conservative (and <a href="http://gawker.com/5402610/moonie-times-collapsing">rapidly collapsing</a>) Moonie-owned <i><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #washingtontimes" href="http://gawker.com/tag/washingtontimes/">Washington Times</a></i> notes that <a href="http://washingtontimes.com/news/2009/nov/24/obamas-big-tent-leaves-out-gop-leaders/">Republicans didn't show up to Obama's dinner</a>. Then, Fox takes over.</p>
<p>The subtext of <a href="http://washingtontimes.com/news/2009/nov/24/obamas-big-tent-leaves-out-gop-leaders/">the <i>Times</i> story</a> is that Obama is classless, and that he snubbed the GOP in his first state dinner. Even though he did actually invite Minority Leaders John Boehner and Mitch McConnell, both of whom snubbed <i>Obama</i> by declining to attend. (He also invited Republican governor Bobby Jindal, who did attend. <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/24/state-dinner-guest-list-b_n_365029.html">And Dick Lugar was there, for some reason.</a> And Eric Cantor, who wasn't invited to the dinner, <i>was</i> invited to the pre-dinner reception.)</p>
<p>So it doesn't look like much of a snub to us, at all. But whatever&mdash;it is fair game for a basically openly conservative paper to publish a news story with a partisan premise, so long as it's factually accurate, which this one is.</p>
<p>Then, of course, <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/11/24/republican-lawmakers-invited-state-dinner/">Fox picks up on this breaking news</a>. Suddenly, the headline switches from "Top Republican lawmakers not <i>attending</i> State Dinner" to "Top Republican Lawmakers Not <i>Invited</i> to Obama's First State Dinner."</p>
<p>"Top Republican lawmakers," taken literally, means Boehner and McConnell, who <i>were</i> invited, and chose not to attend.</p>
<p>But Fox doesn't even acknowledge <i>that.</i></p>
<blockquote>
<p>House Minority Leader John A. Boehner won't be there; he's on Thanksgiving break and home in Ohio. His deputy, Rep. Eric Cantor of Virginia, also didn't get an invitation to the dinner.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Cantor <i>also</i> didn't get an invitation? That's a weird word choice, considering that the guy named in the previous sentence <i>did</i> get an invite. But that fact is, weirdly, edited out.</p>
<p>This is why Fox is way more successful than the Moonie <i>Times</i>: a grown-up could read that <i>Times</i> story and, based on the facts presented in that story, end up disagreeing with its premise. In order to preclude that possibility, Fox just makes up the facts to suit the premise.</p>
<p>(Thanks to readers Ronald and <a href="http://jallenj.tumblr.com/post/255851166/fox-news-at-its-finest">James Allen</a> for alerting us to this very instructional case-study in modern journalism.)</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5412835/in-which-fox-edits-lies-into-the-news]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5412835]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[journalismism]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fox news]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[snubs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[washington times]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:45:20 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pareene]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5412835&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly Declares Victory as 75-Year-Old Man Retires]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/_nVEMSw2-8c&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed name="" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/_nVEMSw2-8c&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object>In 2007, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #billoreilly" href="http://gawker.com/tag/billoreilly/">Bill O'Reilly</a>'s attack dog <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #jessewatters" href="http://gawker.com/tag/jessewatters/">Jesse Watters</a> ambushed veteran lefty journalist <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #billmoyers" href="http://gawker.com/tag/billmoyers/">Bill Moyers</a> at home and yelled at him for a while, about hating the troops. Now, Moyers is retiring. Advantage: O'Reilly!</p>
<p>Moyers, who is 75, had planned on ending his weekly news show at the end of the year, <a href="http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/20/bill-moyers-to-leave-weekly-television/?src=twt&twt=nytimestv">but PBS convinced him to stay on through April 30, 2010.</a> This means, in O'Reilly's fantasy world, that Bill and Jesse <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/24/oreilly-watters-moyers/">totally embarrassed PBS into firing Moyers.</a></p>
<p>Bill ambushed Moyers again in 2008, but he didn't show that clip, because Moyers upstaged the second-string ambush producer that time.</p>
<p><object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_1"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Y_2IZT4VgDY&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed name="" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Y_2IZT4VgDY&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5411956/bill-oreilly-declares-victory-as-75+year+old-man-retires]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5411956]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[feuds]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ambush]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bill moyers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bill o'reilly]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jesse watters]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pbs]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:03:01 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pareene]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5411956&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Sean Hannity Promises to Respond to Comedy Show That Fact-Checked Him]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gawker/2009/11/hannity.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />We all saw the <i><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #dailyshow" href="http://gawker.com/tag/dailyshow/">Daily Show</a></i> fact-checking Fox clip, right? Where Hannity reused 9/12 rally footage and pretended it was from last week? Guess what: Hannity is going to "respond" tonight, on his show! So we'd better all watch!</p>
<table>
<tr valign='middle'>
<td style='padding:0px;' colspan='2'><embed style='display:block' src='http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:255662' width='360' height='301' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' wmode='window' allowfullscreen='true' flashvars='autoPlay=false' allowscriptaccess='always' allownetworking='all' bgcolor='#000000'></td>
</tr>
<tr style='height:18px;' valign='middle'>
<td style='padding:0px;' colspan='2'>
<table style='margin:0px; text-align:center' cellpadding='0' cellspacing='0' width='100%' height='100%'>
<tr valign='middle'>
<td style='padding:3px; width:33%;'><a target='_blank' style='font:10px arial; color:#333; text-decoration:none;' href='http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes'>Daily Show<br>
Full Episodes</a></td>
<td style='padding:3px; width:33%;'><a target='_blank' style='font:10px arial; color:#333; text-decoration:none;' href='http://www.indecisionforever.com'>Political Humor</a></td>
<td style='padding:3px; width:33%;'><a target='_blank' style='font:10px arial; color:#333; text-decoration:none;' href='http://www.thedailyshow.com/videos/tag/health'>Health Care Crisis</a></td>
</tr>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><a href="http://www.thewrap.com/ind-column/sean-hannity-respond-daily-show-report-9977">According to Dylan Stableford:</a> "A rep for Fox says that Hannity will address the issue on his show tonight."</p>
<p>Seriously, what will he say? The video evidence is obvious, and Hannity is heard babbling about how it is "Thursday" over footage from a Saturday in September, thus making some sort of "we didn't intend to deceive we just used rally file footage" argument a nonstarter.</p>
<p>But, you know, this is <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #seanhannity" href="http://gawker.com/tag/seanhannity/">Sean Hannity</a>, who does not care about "the truth" or "honesty" or "<a href="http://gawker.com/5062495/foxs-obama-expert-fears-jews">not booking insane antisemites on the show and not mentioning that they are insane antisemites</a>," so who cares what he will say.</p>
<p>It will probably just be something like "the Jews sneaked in that other footage and tricked me into airing it, because I, Sean Hannity, am an antisemite who hates the Jews."</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5402537/sean-hannity-promises-to-respond-to-comedy-show-that-fact+checked-him]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5402537]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[punditry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[daily show]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sean hannity]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:40:45 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pareene]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5402537&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Coming War for Glenn Beck's Internal Organs]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2009/11/500x_stewartbeck.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />On last night's <i><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #dailyshow" href="http://gawker.com/tag/dailyshow/">Daily Show</a></i>, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #jonstewart" href="http://gawker.com/tag/jonstewart/">Jon Stewart</a> performed a bravura 8-and-a-half minute monologue in the style of <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #glennbeck" href="http://gawker.com/tag/glennbeck/">Glenn Beck</a> on the subject of <a href="http://gawker.com/5397320/glenn-becks-heroic-appendix-attempts-to-kill-him">Glenn Beck's appendicitis.</a></p>
<p>The highlight is probably the unveiling of the conspiratorial internal organ chalkboard. All the notes&mdash;references to old and discredited texts, the Founding Fathers, transparently phony stabs at nonpartisanship, crying&mdash;are hit, though Stewart never quite reaches the operatic unhingedness of a genuine Beck performance. The glasses are a wonderful touch, though.</p>
<p><embed style='display:block' src='http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:254892' width='360' height='301' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' wmode='window' allowfullscreen='true' flashvars='autoPlay=false' allowscriptaccess='always' allownetworking='all' bgcolor='#000000'></p>
<table>
<tr style='height:18px;' valign='middle'>
<td style='padding:0px;' colspan='2'>
<table style='margin:0px; text-align:center' cellpadding='0' cellspacing='0' width='100%' height='100%'>
<tr valign='middle'>
<td style='padding:3px; width:33%;'><a target='_blank' style='font:10px arial; color:#333; text-decoration:none;' href='http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes'>Daily Show<br>
Full Episodes</a></td>
<td style='padding:3px; width:33%;'><a target='_blank' style='font:10px arial; color:#333; text-decoration:none;' href='http://www.indecisionforever.com'>Political Humor</a></td>
<td style='padding:3px; width:33%;'><a target='_blank' style='font:10px arial; color:#333; text-decoration:none;' href='http://www.thedailyshow.com/videos/tag/health'>Health Care Crisis</a></td>
</tr>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5398739/the-coming-war-for-glenn-becks-internal-organs]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5398739]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[daily show]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[glenn beck]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jon stewart]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 06 Nov 2009 10:48:34 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pareene]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5398739&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Glenn Beck's Heroic Appendix Attempts To Kill Him]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/1jg4QeqJN4E&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/1jg4QeqJN4E&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object>Hey, <a href="http://www.theonion.com/content/video/victim_in_fatal_car_accident">this frankly amazing <i>Onion</i> video</a> almost kinda came true! <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #glennbeck" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #glennbeck" href="http://gawker.com/tag/glennbeck/">Glenn Beck</a> <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/fnc/glenn_becks_got_appendicitis_142263.asp?c=rss">suffered an appendicitis attack on-air today.</a></p>
<p>It was <a href="http://www.ntsmediaonline.com/?p=11821">during his radio program,</a> so sadly there is no video of Glenn clutching his abdomen, vomiting, and finally collapsing in pain.</p>
<p>Beck is expected to make a full recovery, after his appendix was removed at "an undisclosed hospital."</p>
<p>Let's hope things go better than they did <a href="http://gawker.com/346080/glenn-beck-just-like-that-lady-who-died-in-the-er">the last time he went to the hospital</a>, when he had to wait for <i>40 minutes</i> in the emergency room! This was back when he was with CNN, so he blamed the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #healthcare" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #healthcare" href="http://gawker.com/tag/healthcare/">health care</a> industry instead of secret Maoist-ACORN Lizard People.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5397320/glenn-becks-heroic-appendix-attempts-to-kill-him]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5397320]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[assholes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cable]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[glenn beck]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[headlines that will get me in trouble]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pundits]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:52:22 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pareene]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5397320&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Fox Getting Something Wrong Clip of the Weekend]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/vrzlM-uZrrs&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/vrzlM-uZrrs&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object>NY-23 update: remember how <a href="http://gawker.com/5395443/your-off+year-election-guide">the Republican dropped out because national movement conservatives smeared her</a> as an abortion-loving socialist? Fox spent two days <a href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2009/11/excellent_news_for_hoffman.php?ref=fpblg">reporting that she then endorsed the Conservative Party candidate</a>. That is the opposite of the truth.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5395574/fox-getting-something-wrong-clip-of-the-weekend]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5395574]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[fox news]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[new york]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:14:20 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pareene]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5395574&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Glenn Beck Warns of Imaginary Fox News Ban]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gawker/2009/10/becktweet.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2009/10/500x_becktweet.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><a href="http://twitter.com/glennbeck/status/5163190069">This Glenn Beck tweet</a> links <a href="http://www.reclinercommentaries.com/2009/10/pelosi-stripping-fox-news-of-access.html">to a blog</a> that has misread <a href="http://www.hughhewitt.com/blog/g/4e4cadf5-7f1f-4572-baf7-fe5955090c52">a piece of obvious (and terrible) satire, penned by a right-wing talk radio producer.</a> Just like he did <a href="http://gawker.com/5388832/rush-limbaugh-falls-for-non+hoax">last week.</a> They don't even get the unfunny jokes <a href="http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/archives/2009/10/latest_rightblo.php">they make themselves!</a></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5390378/glenn-beck-warns-of-imaginary-fox-news-ban]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5390378]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[sigh]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fox news]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[glenn beck]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hoaxes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pundits]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[satire]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 26 Oct 2009 17:26:10 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pareene]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5390378&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Fox Reporter to Host Totally Balanced Anti-Health Care Reform Event]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2009/10/thumb160x_Stossel_John.jpg" class="left image158" width="158" />Look at that, a "reporter" for a "legitimate news organization" is <a href="http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/political-media/fox-news-journalist-john-stossel-appearing-at-anti-health-care-reform-rally/">co-hosting a "day of health care events" sponsored by a conservative advocacy group</a>! His name is <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #johnstossel" href="http://gawker.com/tag/johnstossel/">John Stossel</a> and as of last month he works for <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #foxnews" href="http://gawker.com/tag/foxnews/">Fox News</a>.</p>
<p>To be fair, it was ridiculous back when ABC allowed Stossel to give keynote speeches at conservative/libertarian think tank gala events while still calling him a "reporter" for <i>20/20</i> and not a "pundit" or whatever. He's always had a very specific political agenda and he's always been more than willing to distort the truth in the service of that agenda. In that respect, he's not so different from a Michael Moore, except that he's on the side of evil and also <i>no legitimate news organization has ever tried to pawn off Michael Moore as a regular plain-old "reporter."</i></p>
<p>But! John Stossel is different! He is not fat, first of all, and second of all he has a mustache, and thirdly it is considered a corrective to "liberal bias" to have a dude straight-up lying to prove conservative points on your newscast.</p>
<p>Obviously he is much more at home on Fox, where they only pretend to be unbiased for the purposes of annoying people like us. So the fact that Stossel is actively promoting and co-hosting this Americans For Prosperity anti-<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #healthcare" href="http://gawker.com/tag/healthcare/">health care</a> event is not even really News.</p>
<p>But it is coming as everyone in DC is dropping their monocles at the fact that the White House <i>has been criticizing Fox News.</i> This is Nixonian! The White House is not allowed to say a tv station is not legitimate! It is classic Nixon dirty tricks, to punish Fox by... not granting them interviews with administration officials for the rest of the year, which is two months.</p>
<p>Because, you know, they so often make themselves available to representatives of the RNC, various right-wing think tanks, and Ron Paul's newsletter.</p>
<p>Anyway Joe Conason has <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/fox_news/index.html?story=/opinion/conason/2009/10/22/fox_versus_obama&acquire">a very good little piece that begins to explain what, exactly, Nixon did in his war on the press.</a> He did not criticize the <i>Washington Post</i> for being mean to him. He used the power of the federal government to hurt them financially so that they'd stop reporting truthful thing about him. Calling it "Nixonian" every time a president is upset with a news organization cheapens that man's amazing legacy of bastardry.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5388685/fox-reporter-to-host-totally-balanced-anti+health-care-reform-event]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5388685]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[journalismism]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fox news]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[john stossel]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[richard nixon]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 23 Oct 2009 14:02:15 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pareene]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5388685&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Jake Tapper Demands White House Apologize To Fox News]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/2009/04/custom_1241120629385_tapper_01.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />ABC White House correspondent and <a href="http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2009/03/three_new_reasons_why_jake_tap.html">alleged tool</a> <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #jaketapper" href="http://gawker.com/tag/jaketapper/">Jake Tapper</a> is furious with the White House for saying <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #foxnews" href="http://gawker.com/tag/foxnews/">Fox News</a> is not a "legitimate news organization." <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/the_ticker/tapper_questions_gibbs_about_fox_140696.asp">He had an argument with Robert Gibbs about it!</a></p>
<p>Why bother? Because the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #tvnews" href="http://gawker.com/tag/tvnews/">TV news</a> portion of the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #whitehousepresscorps" href="http://gawker.com/tag/whitehousepresscorps/">White House Press Corps</a> is an exclusive country club of identical privileged tools who've convinced themselves that arguing with a stonewalling flack for an hour a day is doing the dirty work of democracy. And insulting one of them is tantamount to censorship.</p>
<p>White House communications director Anita Dunn <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/12/business/media/12fox.html?pagewanted=all">said Fox News doesn't behave "the way that legitimate news organizations behave,"</a> which is an objectively true statement, as long as your definition of "legitimate news organizations" means organizations in operation after the death of William Randolph Hearst.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2009/10/todays-qs-for-os-wh-10202009.html">This outraged Tapper!</a></p>
<blockquote>
<p>Tapper: It's escaped none of our notice that the White House has decided in the last few weeks to declare one of our sister organizations "not a news organization" and to tell the rest of us not to treat them like a news organization. Can you explain why it's appropriate for the White House to decide that a news organization is not one –</p>
<p>(Crosstalk)</p>
<p>Gibbs: Jake, we render, we render an opinion based on some of their coverage and the fairness that, the fairness of that coverage.</p>
<p>Tapper: But that's a pretty sweeping declaration that they are "not a news organization." How are they any different from, say –</p>
<p>Gibbs: ABC -</p>
<p>Tapper: ABC. MSNBC. Univision. I mean how are they any different?</p>
<p>Gibbs: You and I should watch sometime around 9 o'clock tonight. Or 5 o'clock this afternoon.</p>
<p>Tapper: I'm not talking about their opinion programming or issues you have with certain reports. I'm talking about saying thousands of individuals who work for a media organization, do not work for a "news organization" &mdash; why is that appropriate for the White House to say?</p>
<p>Gibbs: That's our opinion.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>First, they didn't say that Fox is "not a news organization." We just said what they said, and it's true. <a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/200910210003">Eric Boehlert lays out many examples of Fox's "news" programs fucking the truth up</a>, though really their sponsoring of, promotion of, and reporting on the fucking tea parties is all the proof you need that they don't <i>behave</i> anything like <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #abcnews" href="http://gawker.com/tag/abcnews/">ABC News</a>.</p>
<p>Back when Jake Tapper worked for <i>Salon</i>, would he have considered it a ridiculous attack to say that that online 'zine was not objective? Would've he really have quibbled with the idea that a site run by liberal journalist David Talbot might not be considered "legitimate" by a Republican president? Even if they were sending real-life good journalists like Tapper and, later, Michael Scherer to cover the White House? (Of course, no site that publishes Camille Paglia and Cary Tennis can be considered legitimate, but their terribleness transcends partisanship.)</p>
<p>Does Tapper understand that despite the fact that he is very good, personal friends with Major Garrett, Garrett's employer is actually a research and communications arm of the conservative movement? In a much, much, much more direct and partisan fashion than almost any liberal "equivalent" news source? Like, <i>The Nation</i> and Keith Olbermann and <i>The New Republic</i> and Air America are liberal news organizations staffed and run by liberals dedicated to achieving liberal political goals, but if they've ever all joined together to organize a partisan campaign as PR-savvy as the Tea Parties (or the Iraq War) while still maintaining poses of objectivity, we've missed in next to the thousands of op-eds and Special Comments on how Obama is continuing Bush's torture regime and Senate Democrats are spineless cowards.</p>
<p>But now, once again, Jake Tapper is <a href="http://gawker.com/5200487/hey-the-conservatives-all-love-jake-tapper-now">a hero to the right-wing blogs.</a> Because he knows that it is the objective reporters job to always <i>object</i>, to everything. If the President says the ocean is quite large, it is <i>heroic reporting</i> to demand that his spokesman acknowledge that <i>outer space</i> is <i>even bigger.</i></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5386687/jake-tapper-demands-white-house-apologize-to-fox-news]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5386687]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[journalismism]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[abc news]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fox news]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jake tapper]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[robert gibbs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tv news]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[white house press corps]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:27:06 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pareene]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5386687&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Hell's Kitchen Picked the Wrong Magazine]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><script type="text/javascript">
newVideoPlayer("/HK_Gourmet_Mag.flv", 500, 375,"");
</script><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/stills/HK_Gourmet_Mag.flv.jpg"></a>The finale of Fox's <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged HELL'S KITCHEN" href="http://gawker.com/tag/hell.s-kitchen/">Hell's Kitchen</a></em> was last night. We won't tell you who won the competition, but "Most Awkward" prize goes to <a href="http://gawker.com/5374446/the-wrath-of-mckinsey-conde-nast-to-fold-gourmet-three-others">now-dead</a> <em>Gourmet</em> magazine, which was prominently featured in the show! Click to watch the painful highlight clip.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5381566/hells-kitchen-picked-the-wrong-magazine]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5381566]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[videuhoh]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bad timing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gourmet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gourmet magazine]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hell's kitchen]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 14 Oct 2009 12:45:01 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamilton Nolan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5381566&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Oh, Fun: Rupert Murdoch's Supposedly Interested in Buying NBC Universal]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/2009/10/custom_1255441240235_murdoch.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2009/10/500x_custom_1255441240235_murdoch.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Bill O'Reilly, call your office: Citing CNBC, Reuters says <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged RUPERT MURDOCH" href="http://gawker.com/tag/rupert-murdoch/">Rupert Murdoch</a> is interested in buying a piece of <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged NBC UNIVERSAL" href="http://gawker.com/tag/nbc-universal/">NBC Universal</a>, which could lead to a major embarrassment when O'Reilly draws Keith Olbermann in the corporate Secret Santa program.</p>

<p>Reuters says <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/cyclicalConsumerGoodsSector/idUSN1214454620091012">both Murdoch and Liberty Media's John Malone are sniffing around the 20 percent stake in NBC Universal that Vivendi is prepared to sell</a>, but neither man has actually approached NBC Universal owner GE about a deal. As much as we'd love to imagine MSNBC under Murdoch's gentle-but-firm leadership, here's why it's not going to happen:</p>
<p><strong>1.</strong> The report of Murdoch's interest comes via CNBC, which is the <a href="http://www.deadline.com/hollywood/nbcus-cnbc-knocks-down-comcast-report/">preferred in-house avenue for GE getting its messages out there on this deal</a>. So it's almost certainly just a way for GE to keep pressure on Comcast and let them know that it has other options.</p>
<p><strong>2.</strong> The FCC would blow a gasket. News Corp. already owns <a href="http://www.newscorp.com/operations/tvstations.html">two television stations in nine markets</a>, and is maxed out in terms of how many the FCC will let him own. It's unclear to us whether a minority stake in NBC Universal would trigger the <a href="http://www.fcc.gov/ownership/#background">FCC's limits on ownership</a> and require Murdoch to sell off some of his assets in order to satisfy regulators, but the anti-trust implications of one television, cable, and movie giant owning a significant stake of another television, cable, and movie giant&mdash;especially when radical leftists control the White House and the Justice Department&mdash;make it a far stretch.</p>
<p><strong>3.</strong> The Comcast purchase is a done deal, because the mellifluously named prognosticator Bruce Bueno de Mesquita's computer has ordained that it will happen. Bueno de Mesquita, whom the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/16/magazine/16Bruce-t.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all">CIA hires to predict the future using Microsoft Excel and has a purported 90 percent accuracy rate</a>, was <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125538997994481405.html#mod=todays_us_money_and_investing?mg=com-wsj">asked by the <em>Wall Street Journal</em>'s Dennis K. Berman to weigh in on the acquisition</a>, and he says it will happen, based on what Berman told him about the players' intentions:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>For the Comcast-NBCU game, I provided Dr. Bueno de Mesquita a crude approximation of the positions of the dozen parties most likely to influence a deal.</p>
<p>[snip]</p>
<p>Of course, these were rough estimates done on the fly. As Dr. Bueno de Mesquita reminded me, my evaluations could be flawed. His work was done over a weekend, which may influence the quality of the results. Most assignments can take three weeks, at an opening price of $50,000.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Oh, OK. That settles it then.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5380513/oh-fun-rupert-murdochs-supposedly-interested-in-buying-nbc-universal]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5380513]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[media titans]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[deals]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gettypic]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nbc universal]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[news corporation]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rupert murdoch]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 13 Oct 2009 10:27:16 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Cook]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5380513&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Obama Declares War on the Republic of Fox News]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gawker/2009/10/hannity.png"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2009/10/500x_hannity.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>It's <i>war!</i> <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/12/business/media/12fox.html?pagewanted=all">War between Obama and Fox!</a> All that talk about Democrats being too weak to use American might was wrong: Obama will win Afghanistan <i>and</i> the afternoon!</p>
<p>See, the Obama administration just called out Fox as "an opponent" instead of a "legitimate news organization." But Ailes and Axelrod had coffee last week! What's up?</p>
<p>If the Obama White House treats <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged FOX NEWS" href="http://gawker.com/tag/fox-news/">Fox News</a> as the research and propaganda arm of the opposition, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/12/business/media/12fox.html?pagewanted=all">Brian Stelter and the <i>Times</i></a> treat the cable channel more like a foreign nation that the current administration doesn't officially recognize. With Roger Ailes as Foreign Minister and flacks acting as diplomats, Fox and MSNBC work toward <i>detente</i>, the Obama administration refuses to normalize relations without a reduction in arms, the network seeks high-profile defections from John Stossel and Lou Dobbs, and there are rumors of secret treaties between O'Reilly and Olbermann.</p>
<p>As always, Fox pretends to be a regular news station that broadcasts actual news, but, amusingly, they admit to keeping to that high standard only when the unemployed are watching:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Fox argues that its news hours - 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. and 6 to 8 p.m. on weekdays - are objective. The channel has taken pains recently to highlight its news programs, including the two hours led by Shepard Smith, its chief news anchor. And its daytime newscasts draw more viewers than CNN or MSNBC's prime-time programs.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Yes, they are at pains to point out that they have one fantastic, independent, entertaining news anchor, who adheres to a reality-based interpretation of events. And besides: isn't nine hours of truth a day enough for you monsters?</p>
<p>There is a degree to which the entire "war" is mutually beneficial, with both sides firing up the base. But we imagine the Obama White House has also been surprised by the depths of Fox's irresponsibility (witch-hunting, actively organizing and promoting protests of the president's legitimacy, everything Glenn Beck does and says). It's within their power to rein in O'Reilly with flattery, but there's obviously nothing to be done about the rest of Fox's non-"news hours" personalities. They're a bunch of Ahmadinejads.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5379622/obama-declares-war-on-the-republic-of-fox-news]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5379622]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[fox news]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[barack obama]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[brian stelter]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[new york times]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tv news]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[war]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:21:14 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pareene]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5379622&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Lou Dobbs Still Happily Joining Fox News Crusades]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/2009/07/custom_1249062106821_dobbs_01.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />After Glenn Beck got sooooo much attention for it, boring <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged SEAN HANNITY" href="http://gawker.com/tag/sean-hannity/">Sean Hannity</a> decided to go after a "Czar" too. Beck's was <a href="http://gawker.com/5353625/the-resignation-of-van-jones-an-obama-political-achilles-heel-exposed">too <i>black</i></a>, so Hannity set his sights on <a href="http://gawker.com/5367115/meet-the-next-czar-target">one who is too <i>gay.</i></a> Look who's joining the cause!</p>
<p>Why, it's this <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged LOU DOBBS" href="http://gawker.com/tag/lou-dobbs/">Lou Dobbs</a> fellow, a famous host on the CNN network!</p>
<p><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged KEVIN JENNINGS" href="http://gawker.com/tag/kevin-jennings/">Kevin Jennings</a> holds a Bush administration-created post overseeing a Reagan administration-created department dedicated to keeping schools safe. This makes him one of Obama's <i>unconstitutional Czars</i>. Whereas Reagan wanted to keep them safe from drugs and Bush wanted to keep them safe from, uh, terror or something, Obama's hire would like to keep them safe from harassment and bullying. Also&mdash;did we mention?&mdash;he's a gay.</p>
<p>Noted execrable piece of shit Dobbs is not even creative enough to come up with his own smears. The immigration hysteria he stoked for a brief period of attention has died down, so he's reduced to borrowing Sean Heannity's crusade, which was itself stolen from Beck.</p>
<p>Here is the case against Jennings, again:</p>
<ul>
<li>He is a gay.</li>
<li>He got mad at God, once, because he was a gay teenager.</li>
<li>He got stoned.</li>
<li>He is a gay.</li>
<li>He thinks gay kids&mdash;and kids who aren't gay but who are called gay slurs&mdash;should not be beaten, murdered, or driven to suicide.</li>
<li>He tries to educate kids on the importance of not abusing one another.</li>
<li>He is a gay.</li>
<li>This one time this troubled, suicidal, closeted teenager told him he met an older man and maybe had sex with him and Jennings sympathized with him and then said "I hope you know to use a condom."</li>
</ul>
<p>It is that last story, of a troubled student confiding in a sympathetic teacher and receiving sensible and important advice that allowed that problem student to grow into a satisfied and happy adult, that has made right-wingers apoplectic. In order to make their rage at that successful show of liberal compassion sound less like hysterical homophobia, they have been saying that Jennings "failed to report" "statutory rape." Even though Jennings never explicitly said the kid had had sex with anyone yet and also, <i>much more importantly</i>, the kid was <i>sixteen years old</i>, which is the <i>age of consent in Massachusetts.</i></p>
<p>Does that seem like a problem? That they can't spin this into a horrible act because no crime was committed? So in fact they're just mad that Jennings didn't destroy this kid's life by telling his parents or something about the kid's gross gay sex with a gross old gay guy? Here's what you do: you repeatedly and shamelessly lie, even when the reporters on your own network correct your lying with "reporting."</p>
<p>On October 2, Lou Dobbs <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200910020046">repeated the "statutory rape" thing.</a> He was corrected by Joe Conason. And if he watched <i>his own network</i> he would've seen <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200910020046">Jessica Yellin correcting Fox's reports</a> the same day!</p>
<p>Which means, of course, that <i>yesterday</i> <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200910060044">Dobbs repeated a thing he knew to be untrue</a> because Gay Immigrants Are Going to Turn Your Children Into Well-Dressed Mexicans.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5376330/lou-dobbs-still-happily-joining-fox-news-crusades]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5376330]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[shooting czars]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cnn]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[czars]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[kevin jennings]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lou dobbs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sean hannity]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shitheads]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[the gays]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:17:57 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pareene]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5376330&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Fox Rains on the So You Think You Can Dance On-Air Vagina Parade]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><script type="text/javascript">
newVideoPlayer("/SYTYCD_Vag.flv", 500, 375,"");
</script>Looks like Rupert Murdoch isn't going to have to open up his gargantuan wallet to pay off the FCC because of a <a href="http://gawker.com/5371293/how-much-fox-will-be-fined-for-so-you-think-you-can-dance-vagina"><em>So You Think You Can Dance</em> vagina slip</a>. Why? Well, there was no vagina.</p>
<p>As many of you pointed out, the dancer was actually wearing flesh-colored briefs under her dress. The network provided photos to the <em>Washington Post</em>'s TV Column today, where you can <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/01/AR2009100104866.html">clearly see the underwear</a>. Guess everyone who said a female dancer was too smart to go on a TV show wearing a skirt without any protection was right.</p>
<p>However, the mock scandal was good for ratings. The ratings went up by about two million viewers for the show that aired the day after the news broke. And when the show's ratings are just at 7 million people, they need every pair of eyeballs they can get, even if that means using a transparent pair of undies to get them there.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://defamer.gawker.com/5373186/fox-rains-on-the-so-you-think-you-can-dance-on+air-vagina-parade]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5373186]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[scandal]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[so you think you can dance]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 02 Oct 2009 16:34:01 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Moylan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5373186&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Wow, People Are Actually Watching These New Shows!]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gawker/2009/09/glee_13-glee-kids-stairs_1819_lyv1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2009/09/500x_glee_13-glee-kids-stairs_1819_lyv1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>We've gotten most of the new series premieres out of the way, and a funny thing happened&mdash;most of them are doing pretty well. What does all this mean?</p>
<p>It means that we will miss out on our favorite part of the television season, where, after all the months of hype, a bunch of shows fail spectacularly and are canceled after only a few weeks. Usually that time of year is right now, and so far we only have one casualty (RIP <em>TBL</em>). Fuck this series of slow deaths, we miss our annual massacre!</p>
<p>It also means that we're going to be stuck with <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged NCIS: LOS ANGELES" href="http://gawker.com/tag/ncis%7c-los-angeles/">NCIS: Los Angeles</a></em> and a host of other crap for the long haul. It also means that, while many are performing well, thanks to NBC and their awful <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged JAY LENO" href="http://gawker.com/tag/jay-leno/">Jay Leno</a> experiment, there are actually fewer series premieres this year than usual. It even further means there are fewer people watching network television. You know when your show doesn't even crack 10 million and it's considered a big victory times are getting tough.</p>
<p>Here's a breakdown of how everything is doing so far:</p>
<p><strong>The Good</strong>:</p>
<ul>
<li><em><strong>NCIS: Los Angeles</strong></em> (CBS) is the clear breakout hit with 18.7 million on its debut, proving once again that Americans love shitty television.</li>
<li><strong><em>The Good Wife</em></strong> (CBS) bobbled most of it's lead in, but pulled in an excellent 13.7 million viewers and won its time slot. Way to go, Carol Hathaway!</li>
<li><strong><em>Modern Family</em></strong> (ABC) rode positive ratings to a 12.7 million bow and its companion <em><strong>Cougar Town</strong></em> (ABC) was right behind it with 11.6.</li>
<li><strong><em>Flash Forward</em></strong> (ABC) predicted itself 12.4 million viewers, so we'll at least see how the mystery ends. Still, it's no <em>Lost</em>.</li>
<li><em><strong>The Vampire Diaries</strong></em> only scared up 4.8 million (shit more teenage girls than that stand wailing out front of Robert Pattinson's hotel room on a daily basis), but that was <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged THE CW" href="http://gawker.com/tag/the-cw/">The CW</a>'s highest debut ever.</li>
<li><strong><em>The Cleveland Show</em></strong> (Fox) did just about as well as <em>Family Guy</em> with a 9.4 million on a Sunday night.</li>
<li><strong><em>Accidentally on Purpose</em></strong> (CBS) made 9 million people not laugh.</li>
<li><strong><em>The Forgotten</em></strong> (ABC) and <em><strong>Eastwick</strong></em> (ABC) were just on the right side of average with 9.5 and 9.3 million respectively.</li>
<li>Though the numbers for <strong><em>Glee</em></strong> (Fox) weren't the highest at 7.3 million, it's still being considered a victory since a show this good and quirky actually seems to be finding some sort of audience.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>The Bad</strong>:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong><em>The Jay Leno Show</em></strong> (NBC) started out nice and strong with an amazing 18 million, but then fell to 5.7 million a week later and its ratings continue to go up and down a bit, but usually lands at the bottom of the pile. Please, please, make the unfunny stop!</li>
<li><strong><em>Community</em></strong> (NBC) also had a strong debut, keeping most of the run-off from the Office for an audience of 7.7 million. However, the next week, more than 2 million checked out and its ratings were down to 5.4 million.</li>
<li>Medical drama <em><strong>Mercy</strong></em> (NBC) will be on life support soon, with only 8.2 checking it out on it's first Wednesday night. Yes, NBC officially sucks.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>The Ugly</strong>:</p>
<ul>
<li><em><strong>Brothers</strong></em> (Fox) started off with 2.8 million. Let's see how long it holds on.</li>
<li><em><strong>Melrose Place</strong></em> is hobbling along with only 2.3 million viewers in its opening week, and not much more since then. The network has ordered more episodes and Heather Locklear is set to come back in November, so lets hope she can breathe life into this thing for the second time.</li>
<li><em><strong>The Beautiful Life</strong></em> (CW) already got it's ass canceled. We blame Mischa Barton's wisdom teeth.</li>
</ul>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://defamer.gawker.com/5369577/wow-people-are-actually-watching-these-new-shows]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5369577]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[ratings report]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[abc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cbs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jay leno]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nbc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[NCIS: Los Angeles]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[the cw]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:47:51 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Moylan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5369577&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The War Against Census Takers]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/AiFdKdsq4Wk&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/AiFdKdsq4Wk&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object>The coroner of Clay County, <strike>Kansas</strike> Kentucky has confirmed <a href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/09/coroner_confirms_fed_written_on_sparkmans_chest.php">that the word "FED"</a> was scrawled on the dead body of census worker and teacher Bill Sparkman, who was found asphyxiated earlier this month.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/right-wing-census-paranoia-video">Here is a video</a> of various popular television news show hosts and elected officials&mdash;well, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged GLENN BECK" href="http://gawker.com/tag/glenn-beck/">Glenn Beck</a> and <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MICHELE BACHMANN" href="http://gawker.com/tag/michele-bachmann/">Michele Bachmann</a> (R-MN)&mdash;explaining that the census was part of a plot to round up patriotic Americans and place them in internment camps.</p>
<p>Also included: a fun amateur short-film in which a young man in fatigues aims an assault rifle at a census taker. The best part is when the crazy patriot holds up his handy copy of the Constitution, which explains that you only have to answer one question from the census taker and if they try to ask anymore you are free to shoot them.</p>
<p>Authories have not yet declared Sparkman's death a homicide, Oviously, there is a hell of a lot we don't know about the case, and we are actually leaning toward "killed by meth producers" instead of politically motivated domestic terror, but it is still worth pointing out that these people in this video are insane.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5367828/the-war-against-census-takers]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5367828]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[death]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[census]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[glenn beck]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[michele bachmann]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[murder]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[paranoia]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[violence]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:06:19 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pareene]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5367828&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Glee Gives Us Reasons to Keep Living]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Fox won't stop believing in <em>Glee</em>, poised to <a href="http://www.thrfeed.com/2009/09/fox-glee-full-season-.html">pick show up</a> for the full season.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://defamer.gawker.com/5364463/glee-gives-us-reasons-to-keep-living]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5364463]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[hurray!]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[glee]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:33:19 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Moylan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5364463&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly: Socialist]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gawker/2009/09/billo.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Well well well! We liberals have caught <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged BILL O'REILLY" href="http://gawker.com/tag/bill-o.reilly/">Bill O'Reilly</a> in another of his <i>hypocritical lies!</i> That conservative blowhard can't get away with announcing his... <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/09/17/oreilly-public-option/">support of a government-backed public insurance option?</a></p>
<p>Huh. Here's the old "Worst Person In the World" chatting with a Heritage Foundation Hack about <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged HEALTH CARE" href="http://gawker.com/tag/health-care/">health care</a> reform.</p>
<p><object width="448" height="368"><param name="movie" value="http://www.dailykostv.com/flv/player.swf">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<param name="flashvars" value="config=http://www.dailykostv.com/w/002154/vxml.php?448">
<embed src="http://www.dailykostv.com/flv/player.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="448" height="368" flashvars="config=http://www.dailykostv.com/w/002154/vxml.php?448"></object>He, uh, he has just endorsed a public option, basically.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>I want, not for personally for me, but for working Americans, to have a option, that if they don't like their health insurance, if it's too expensive, they can't afford it, if the government can cobble together a cheaper insurance policy that gives the same benefits, I see that as a plus for the folks.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>So there's that!</p>
<p>Bill is, of course, an avowed <i>independent</i>, beholden to no party, but what that usually means is that he will occasionally tell his audience that a certain Democrat it not necessarily a traitor. In the past, as far as we can remember, his independence has not led him to actually support any actual liberal policy proposal.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5362533/bill-oreilly-socialist]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5362533]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[punditry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bill o'reilly]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[socialism]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:04:19 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pareene]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5362533&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Gimmick Blogs To Conquer Television]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/2009/09/custom_1252601380201_textmessaging.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />If you're tired of hearing tales of how your downstairs neighbor got a book deal for his online compilation of images of his bad hair days, we've got news for you. Brace yourself to hear about his TV development deal.</p>
<p>In an historic breakthrough bringing us one step closer to the moment when all media folds in on itself and swallows the universe, Fox TV has announced plans<a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118008348.html?categoryid=14&cs=1&nid=2562"></a> to develop the website, "<a href="http://www.textsfromlastnight.com/">Texts From Last Night</a>" into a TV series.</p>
<p>The website invites people to share "the text messages you shouldn't have sent last night," streaming classics of modern literature such as, "Do you remember peeing on the wall and then yelling at us to stop looking at your dick?" &mdash; which will no doubt form the basis of the pilot episode's B-plot.</p>
<p>The <em>Variety</em> story reveals the writer, "will loosely base the show's characters and plot on the whole idea of racy &mdash; and sometimes embarrassing &mdash; communication, particularly among the twentysomething set."</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://defamer.gawker.com/5356541/gimmick-blogs-to-conquer-television]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5356541]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[being and nothingness]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[deals]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[text messaging]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Texts From Last Night]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 10 Sep 2009 13:08:17 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Rushfield]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5356541&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Why Ellen Was Picked for American Idol]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/2009/09/custom_1252599784968_ellendegeneris.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />For all the attention Washington's bluster gets, history will see this little health care squabble as a mere sideshow distraction from the news we received yesterday; news that will fundamentally alter the way we pick our next <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged AMERICAN IDOL" href="http://gawker.com/tag/american-idol/">American Idol</a></em>.</p>
<p>In national politics, fundamental procedural changes come but once every hundred years or so &mdash; the electoral college will likely outlive us all. Whereas with <em>Idol</em>, those citizens who deeply care about the future of their society, the honest, hard working Americans who stay up late speed dialing votes, who devote their families savings to make signs and printing t-shirts for their favorite contestants &mdash; all because they dare to dream of passing on a better world to their children&mdash; those people now find <em>their</em> America turned on its head, as they see their judiciary shaken up once again with the news that there will now be four judges on <em>American Idol</em>, and one of them will be a comedian.</p>
<p>While it will be for history to decide what the long term effects on our society were, some first thoughts about what this means for the most important show in the history of the world, and why it happened:</p>
<p>• <strong>Mixing It Up:</strong> At the beginning of last season, Fox's Reality Chief Mike Darnell told me that the challenge of the show from here on in would be constantly finding ways to keep it fresh and surprising in its eighth and ninth seasons, at the point where most TV shows are adopting orphans and relocating the series to Miami in desperate attempts to regain some interest. But that is what shows typically do when they are in free fall towards the bottom. Idol, despite being off its heights, still remains the #1 show in television by a mile and in that position, very few shows are willing to take chances with the basic formula. Say what you will about Fox and <em>Idol</em>, they are not afraid to take risks.</p>
<p>• <strong>Judges Rule:</strong> In exile from <em>Idol</em>, former showrunner and <em>So You Thing You Can Dance</em> boss <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged NIGEL LYTHGOE" href="http://gawker.com/tag/nigel-lythgoe/">Nigel Lythgoe</a> has been offering the opinion that the judges' soap opera has gotten so carried away it is eclipsing the contestants. Last season, many <em>Idol</em> watchers were dismayed by how much the hi-jinx at the judges table sapped gobs of attention from the performers. And off-stage, every week the headlines were dominated by another judges story. It is Lythgoe's view that the show lives or dies on the strength of its contestants, not by the soap opera on the floor &mdash; which with four judges had become a monster. When Paula departed it was the hope of many that this would be used as an opportunity to deflate the panel back to its original size. It was not to be.</p>
<p>• <strong>Tivo Alert:</strong> Last season, the pile-up at the judges table caused the show to run over almost every week. Most egregiously, Adam Lambert's finest performance of the season, <em>Mad World</em>, was not seen by Tivo viewers. Despite howls of complaints it seemed impossible to rein in the judges. The addition of another judge who is already a star, with a very healthy ego of her own who will no doubt want to make sure her points get heard, will not help this cause.</p>
<p>• <strong>Nice Lives:</strong> Comedian though she is, Ellen has been the BFF to many an <em>Idol</em> contestant, having them all on her show and supporting each and every one. Likely, she has been thought of as one who will bring this caring concern to the cold-hearted panel.</p>
<p>• <strong>Quip-o-Rama:</strong> It has been said that this will bring a different element to the <em>Idol</em> judiciary, namely comedy. But in fact, that has more or less been <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged SIMON COWELL" href="http://gawker.com/tag/simon-cowell/">Simon Cowell</a>'s function, providing just the right metaphorical one-liner to explain why a performance sucked. It's not like he provides serious musical instruction. Will the judging now become the equivalent of a Friar's Club roast?</p>
<p>Certainly, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged ELLEN DEGENERES" href="http://gawker.com/tag/ellen-degeneres/">Ellen DeGeneres</a> has been around the block in entertainment. But this is no little ABC sitcom, this is no Oscar telecast with Bruce Villanch there to back you up; this is <em>American Idol</em> and Ellen has just graduated from AAA baseball to the Indy 500. How she fares will depend very much though, not just on talent, but how seriously she takes the sacred responsibility that has been thrust upon her. History waits to judge.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://defamer.gawker.com/5356515/why-ellen-was-picked-for-american-idol]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5356515]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[idols]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[american idol]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ellen degeneres]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nigel lythgoe]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[simon cowell]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:30:49 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Rushfield]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5356515&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Fox News Twitter Hacked Spoofed]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gawker/2009/08/foxtwitter.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2009/08/500x_foxtwitter.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Well, <i>probably</i> hacked. Either hacked or Fox decided to <a href="http://twitter.com/AllFOXNews">break the news themselves that "Sean Hannity Blows his mom."</a> <b>Update:</b></p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gawker/2009/08/lovefox.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2009/08/500x_lovefox.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><br>
<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged FOX NEWS" href="http://gawker.com/tag/fox-news/">Fox News</a> wants to make out with Barack Obama. Get off the internet if you're gonna keep hitting the white wine, Kilmeade!</p>
<p><strong>Update:</strong> Oh, <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/online/sarah-palin-sucks-and-other-things-fox-news-just-tweeted/">it was a fake Twitter account to begin with</a>.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5349762/fox-news-twitter-hacked-spoofed]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5349762]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[found poetry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bill o'reilly]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fox news]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hackers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hacks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sean hannity]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 31 Aug 2009 18:07:33 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pareene]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5349762&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Double Entendres Of August]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><script type="text/javascript">
newVideoPlayer("/sexual_newsanchors.flv", 506, 423,"");
</script><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/stills/sexual_newsanchors.flv.jpg"></a>There is so little "real news," in August. So you can create your own conspiratorial mythology, like Glenn Beck, or you can just turn literally everything you say into a "<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged THAT'S WHAT SHE SAID" href="http://gawker.com/tag/that.s-what-she-said/">that's what she said</a>" joke, like everyone else on TV.</p>
<p>Intern <a href="http://arigolub.tumblr.com/">Ari Golub</a> compiled this truly impressive clip of everyone on every channel at every hour of the day making barely veiled oral sex and gay jokes, nonstop, because we are not a very mature nation.</p>
<p>Special shout-out to Brian Kilmeade, the friendliest of the <i>Fox & Friends</i>, who seems strangely repelled by and drawn to any physical contact of any kind among manly men, naked together in showers or no.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5347991/the-double-entendres-of-august]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5347991]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[sex]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[double entendre]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fox and friends]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jokes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[martha stewart]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[that's what she said]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 28 Aug 2009 15:00:08 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pareene]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5347991&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[America's Favorite Mad Man: Glenn Beck!]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><object width="502" height="309" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/L0OUXkZO8vE&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/L0OUXkZO8vE&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="502" height="309" class="left gawkerVideo"></object><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged GLENN BECK" href="http://gawker.com/tag/glenn-beck/">Glenn Beck</a>, who is now just explicitly repackaging race-baiting apocalyptic Alex Jones conspiracy theories and <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200908270038">misspelling OLIGARCHY</a>, broke 3 million viewers last Wednesday. That is more than <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0809/Beck_outrates_Mad_Men.html">your favorite show!</a></p>
<p><i><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MAD MEN" href="http://gawker.com/tag/mad-men/">Mad Men</a></i>, the famous and brilliant television show about how it was weird and bad but also secretly really fucking awesome when dudes smoked and drank at work while treating women like shit (and everyone dressed better but there were no black people), was incessantly hyped by every wing of the East Coast Liberal Media Elite for weeks before its new season started, and the premiere drew 2.8 million viewers.</p>
<p>This will all change of course once Sarah Palin tells her fans to watch <i>Mad Men.</i> Someone send her some DVDs!</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5347875/americas-favorite-mad-man-glenn-beck]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5347875]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[real america]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cable]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cable news]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[glenn beck]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[i have never watched 'mad men']]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mad men]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[psychos]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 28 Aug 2009 12:43:35 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pareene]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5347875&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Get Out the Croquet Set, Heathers Is Headed to TV]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/2009/08/custom_1251392604369_heathers.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Fox <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118007810.html?categoryid=13&cs=1&nid=2562">announced today</a> that they're bringing the dead mean girls back from the grave for a small screen version of every hipster's favorite 1988 black comedy. So, what's their damage?</p>
<p>The show will be written by <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged MARK RIZZO" href="http://gawker.com/tag/mark-rizzo/">Mark Rizzo</a> (of <em>Men in Trees</em> fame) with help from <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged JENNY BICKS" href="http://gawker.com/tag/jenny-bicks/">Jenny Bicks</a> (of <em>Sex and the City</em> with the cooperation of Lakeshore entertainment, which owns the rights to the movie. Says Lakeshore honcho Gary Lucchesi: "We had the title, and talked about doing a film remake at times, but doing it for TV seemed like a fresh and original idea," Oh yeah, that idea is about as original as a <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged WINONA RYDER" href="http://gawker.com/tag/winona-ryder/">Winona Ryder</a> shoplifting joke.</p>
<p>All the characters from the original will be back, but no word on how it's going to work as a serialized comedy. Can you really keep faking suicides for <em>seasons</em>? Rizzo hasn't discussed any updates, like changing the name to <em>Madisons</em>. Guess we're just going to have to wait and see. And, what does this mean for <a href="http://news-briefs.ew.com/2009/03/12/heathers-musica/">Heathers: The Musical</a>. We'd much rather see that.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5347028/get-out-the-croquet-set-heathers-is-headed-to-tv]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5347028]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[nostalgia rules!]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[heathers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jenny bicks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mark rizzo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[winona ryder]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 27 Aug 2009 13:27:03 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Moylan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5347028&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Shep Smith Has an HD Surprise for Us!]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><script type="text/javascript">
newVideoPlayer("/FOXHD.flv", 506, 423,"");
</script><i>Studio B With Shepar Smith's</i> new HD weather graphics? They do not really seem completely finished, maybe. But still, Fox is 200% more high-def than all the other cable news networks! Plus!</p>
<p>"We've got an HD surprise coming soon," Shep promises. "But it's a surprise, so I can't talk about it. But it's coming." We don't even have HD and we are still excited. Is it a car chase?</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5341179/shep-smith-has-an-hd-surprise-for-us]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5341179]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cable]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hdtv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shepard smtih]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tv news]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:29:19 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pareene]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5341179&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Natalie Portman Looks Over Her Shoulder for a Zombie Attack]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/2009/08/custom_1250104998515_Natalie.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Someone needs to tell AMC that vampires are the host monster now, as they shell out big bucks for a zombie show. <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged NATALIE PORTMAN" href="http://gawker.com/tag/natalie-portman/">Natalie Portman</a> also gets a TV deal. And Legos (yes, the toy) are coming to the big screen.</p>
<p><strong>AMC</strong> got all classy with critical and Emmy favorites <em>Mad Men</em> and <em>Breaking Bad</em> and then they went and ruined it all bypaying a whole lot of cash for a show about undead stumbling brain eaters. They acquired the rights to Robert Kirkman's comic book <em><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged THE WALKING DEAD" href="http://gawker.com/tag/the-walking-dead/">The Walking Dead</a></em> which follows the lives of the survivors of a zombie apocalypse. Sounds to us like <em>28 Days</em> or every other zombie movie. But, since it's on AMC, it's going to be a <em>smart</em> zombie show. [<a href="http://www.thrfeed.com/2009/08/amc-lands-zombie-comic-book-project.html">THRfeed</a>]</p>
<p><strong>Natalie Portman</strong> designs vegan shoes and went to Harvard. She's so hip and so smart. Fox thinks so to, and now she's producing a comedy called <em>Booksmart</em> about two smart girls who can't find boyfriends. Oh, they never can. [<a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118007176.html">Variety</a>]</p>
<p>Danish toymaker <strong>Lego</strong> has finally allowed someone to make a movie about their plastic boxes and barely bending men. <strong>Warner Bros.</strong> is developing a hush-hush, live action/animation flick from writers Dan and Kevin Hageman. Well, the performances from the plastic playthings can't be any worse than a heavily-botoxed actress. <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118007162.html">Variety</a>]</p>
<p><strong>MTV</strong> orders up two <em>Jackass</em> ripoffs, a <em>Hills</em> rip off (set in New York, watch out!), a variety show, and <em>Hard Times</em> their first single-camera comedy. It's about a kid who is trying to survive being 15. Hey, maybe he can go out with one of Natalie Portman's girls. [<a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3idee9d1f93a71c5751b391ef3ebea57d5">THR</a>]</p>
<p><strong><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged ED HELMS" href="http://gawker.com/tag/ed-helms/">Ed Helms</a></strong> is on a hot streak. He just inked his second deal since <em>The Hangover</em> made all that money. His next pic (after <em>Cedar Rapids</em>) is a comedy called <em>Central Intelligence</em> where he plays an accountant who becomes a spy after finding an old friend on Facebook. Damn, all we ever find are the annoying girls who sat next to us in French class. [<a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118007171.html?categoryid=13&cs=1&ref=bd_film">Variety</a>]</p>
<p>The top shows last night were <em>America's Got Talent</em>, <em>Hell's Kitchen</em>, and <em>Big Brother</em>. Wait. You mean Americans like reality shows? [<a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118007196.html?categoryid=14&cs=1&ref=bd_tv">Variety</a>]</p>
<p>The <strong>Emmys</strong> give up on the idea of presenting the writing and editing categories early so that they can speed up their telecast. Your local news is pissed. [<a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3i41bbbd5e87896f5524e0de776c947bc4">THR</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://defamer.gawker.com/5335976/natalie-portman-looks-over-her-shoulder-for-a-zombie-attack]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5335976]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[trade round-up]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[amc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ed helms]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[legos]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mtv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[natalie portman]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[the emmys]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[the walking dead]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:32:38 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Moylan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5335976&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Hand-Written Signs Prove Legitimacy of Town Hall Protests]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><script type="text/javascript">
newVideoPlayer("/signssigns.flv", 506, 423,"");
</script>Some liberals and elected Democrats have asserted that the anti-health care reform town hall protesters are engaged in "astroturfing," a term meaning corporate-sponsored pretend grassroots activity. But Fox has definitively disproved that.</p>
<p>See, a blogger took a picture of anti-health care protesters outside a town hall. Their signs were hand-made, with markers and stuff! Then, to drive the point home, they show another picture of people advocating <i>for</i> health care reform. Their signs were printed professionally!</p>
<p>Thus something or other is proven beyond any possible doubt. If this group of people wrote things on signs by themselves, the Town Hall disruption campaign can't possibly be a <a href="http://politics.theatlantic.com/2009/08/conservative_organizers_people_are_just_angry.php">coordinated media effort by Dick Armey's FreedomWorks</a>.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5334009/hand+written-signs-prove-legitimacy-of-town-hall-protests]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5334009]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[astroturfing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[culture wars]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[demonstrations]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[protests]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sigh]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 10 Aug 2009 12:09:28 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pareene]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5334009&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly Loves Kids, Obama]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gawker/2009/08/parade.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2009/08/504x_parade.jpg" class="left image500" width="500"></a>Oh, look, a picture of <a href="http://gawker.com/5331767/bill-oreillys-love-letter-to-barack-obama">Bill O'Reilly's Valentine to Obama</a>. Look at that hilarious multiculti group of kids he is with! Is this a college admissions brochure? <a href="http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2310756/posts">FreeRepublic commenters</a> are <i>making loofah jokes!</i> (Adorable, guys, but it's "falafel.") [<a href="http://www.mediaite.com/print/bill-oreilly-puts-his-love-for-barack-obama-into-a-parade-column/">Mediaite</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5332541/bill-oreilly-loves-kids-obama]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5332541]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[pundits]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[barack obama]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bill o'reilly]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[kids]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[parade]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 07 Aug 2009 15:06:36 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pareene]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5332541&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly's Love Letter to Barack Obama]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gawker/2009/08/billo.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />As Glenn Beck, Lou Dobbs, Rush, and other wackos compete to be the loudest and most hysterical opponent of <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged BARACK OBAMA" href="http://gawker.com/tag/barack-obama/">Barack Obama</a>, one former boogeyman has toned it way down. <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0809/Bill_OReilly_pens_ode_to_Obama_seriously.html">Bill O'Reilly just wrote the President a nationally syndicated birthday card.</a></p>
<p>In Sunday's <i>Parade</i> magazine, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged BILL O'REILLY" href="http://gawker.com/tag/bill-o.reilly/">Bill O'Reilly</a> writes a long, glowing tribute headlined "What President Obama Can Teach America's Kids." It's not like a sarcastic "he can teach the kids to be a secret radical communist" thing either.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"Barack Obama, a youngster in Hawaii without his parents around, has toughed it out and become one of history's great stories, no matter what happens going forward," he writes at the end. "What he has achieved in his 48 years is simply astounding. Consider the odds. The United States is a nation of more than 300 million citizens. Only one person is currently the Commander in Chief. That man had no fatherly guidance, is of mixed race, and had no family connections to guide him into the world of national politics. That adds up to one simple truth that every American child should be told: 'If Barack Obama can become the President of the United States, then whatever dream you may have can happen in your life.'"</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Now most of this inspiring life story and only-in-America stuff was covered by almost everyone else back in January, and none of it is even remotely controversial or scandalous, but admiring a man you disagree with is not a very popular concept in the partisan media.</p>
<p>Of course Bill has always held himself to be more independent than true-blue GOP water carriers (even when that is patent bullshit), and he has generally shown no desire to be thought of as a right-wing talk radio shock jock, but his self-declared independence rarely stops him from whole-heartedly embracing the arguments and language of Republican talking points on nearly every issue. (He's still going after GE and abortion doctors, obviously.)</p>
<p>But: Obama did his show. Obama showed him that courtesy, and Bill didn't end up being one of the leaders of the right-wing media revolt against the president.</p>
<p>Let this be a lesson to Democrats: doing O'Reilly may grant him unwarranted legitimacy, but it'll shut him up, too. If you're nice enough to him he'll write a long column about how pretty you are and how much he wants to kiss you and stuff.</p>
<p>We'll monitor the usual channels for outraged conservative blogger responses to this bit of turncoatery.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5331767/bill-oreillys-love-letter-to-barack-obama]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5331767]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[best friends]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[barack obama]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bill o'reilly]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[love letters]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[parade]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pundits]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 06 Aug 2009 16:50:47 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pareene]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5331767&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Glenn Beck: Man of A Thousand Voices]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><script type="text/javascript">
newVideoPlayer("/GlennBeckImpression.flv", 506, 423,"");
</script>It's best to watch this clip without any context or introduction. Just click, and press play, and prepare to be entertained.</p>
<p>Yes, it's famous stand-up comedian and sit-down demagogue <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged GLENN BECK" href="http://gawker.com/tag/glenn-beck/">Glenn Beck</a>, of <i>Glenn Beck's Kavalkade of Komedy, Krying, and Kommunism</i>, performing all of his world-famous funny voices. Like a 21st century Jackie Gleason, a generation has grown up on Glenn's beloved characters.</p>
<p>And the gang's all here! Annoying wife speaking gibberish, Snagglepuss, Kermit the Economist Frog, Casey Kasem, sarcastic Hippie guy pretending to cure cancer (??), Rush Limbaugh (??), Hans and Franz (??), yodeling Hawaiian superhero, Fish Yoda (a personal favorite of ours), opera singer in old Warner Brothers cartoon, drunk guy in old movie, Gollum, whiny teenager, Scooby Doo, dolphin caught in plastic, and, of course, angry dude shouting about something.</p>
<p>Please, enjoy.</p>
<p>[Thanks to video intern <a href="http://kgawker.tumblr.com/">Krutika Mallikarjuna</a> for putting this together.]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5330803/glenn-beck-man-of-a-thousand-voices]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5330803]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[that's entertainment]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[crazies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fox news]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[glenn beck]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[insanity]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[personalities]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tv news]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 05 Aug 2009 15:04:37 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pareene]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5330803&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Glenn Beck Asks The Crazies to Pray Instead of Shooting People]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><script type="text/javascript">
newVideoPlayer("/Beck_God_Obama.flv", 506, 423,"");
</script>On Fox's <i>Romper Room and Friends</i> this morning, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #glennbeck" href="http://gawker.com/tag/glennbeck/">Glenn Beck</a> said we should all probably save the nation with the power of prayer.</p>
<p>People ask Glenn Beck, all the time, "what can we do? What can we do? What can we do? What can we do?" He recommends falling to our knees, to God.</p>
<p>Beck spends 90% of his time trying to convince people that an illegitimate and dangerous leader is actually actively destroying the nation. If you are a crazy person, that might alarm or upset you! You might think you should <i>do</i> something about it, even! Beck does not actually necessarily want people to <i>act</i> as though the terrifying things he says are true, though. He would like them to channel the fear and rage that he <i>creates</i> into something non-destructive. Like, who knows, praying that things will get better. <a href="http://gawker.com/5329442/glenn-beck-to-his-viewers-please-refrain-from-homicidal-rampages&quot;">Just please don't shoot anyone, guys!</a></p>
<p>Anoka, Minnesota's own <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #gretchencarlson" href="http://gawker.com/tag/gretchencarlson/">Gretchen Carlson</a>, on praying for guidance: "that's not a popular thing in this world of 'PC' where everything's 'correct.'" What is Rose Nylund's unlikable beauty contestant little sister even talking about. Has she ever <i>been</i> to America? You can't inaugurate a president, fight a war, write album liner notes, or kick of fucking field goal without someone praying for guidance!</p>
<p>Haunted marionette <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #stevedoocy" href="http://gawker.com/tag/stevedoocy/">Steve Doocy</a> mentions that lots of people at his church have been praying, lately, but Beck knows that is <i>selfish</i> praying, for themselves, and not the kind of praying that we need, which is to save the whole country, from the racist tyrant president.</p>
<p>(And then Beck says something slightly inaudible about Obama being "a black nationalist" because someone mentioned raising taxes maybe.)</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5330057/glenn-beck-asks-the-crazies-to-pray-instead-of-shooting-people]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5330057]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[fox & friends]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cable news]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[glenn beck]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[god]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gretchen carlson]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[prayer]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[steve doocy]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 04 Aug 2009 17:37:41 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pareene]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5330057&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Glee Will Soon Be Back to Turn Those Frowns]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gawker/2009/07/glee_logo.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Oh, joy. Glee, even. Fox's <a href="http://gawker.com/5262638/glee-more-than-lives-up-to-its-name">rousing, wonderful new musical series</a> is now <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/showtracker/2009/07/fox-unveils-new-scene-from-glee-announces-new-fall-premiere-dates.html">officially slated</a> for a September 9th return. Plus there's been a new musical number clip released, and it is <i>fabulous</i>. "Bust Ya Windows" fabulous. Here it is:</p>

<p><object width="512" height="296"><param name="movie" value="http://www.hulu.com/embed/ezBq1htPsnLKHSMm1ShJkg">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.hulu.com/embed/ezBq1htPsnLKHSMm1ShJkg" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="512" height="296"></object></p>
<p>Looks terrific, right! And sort of intriguing that not every musical number will be strictly in the format of the club's performances. No, it looks as though we might get some Rob Marshall/<i>Chicago</i>-style fantasy songs. Which is fun! And fresh, for television. Hopefully <i>High School Musical</i> kids, now a little grown up, will appreciate this next step in their evolution.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://defamer.gawker.com/5324861/glee-will-soon-be-back-to-turn-those-frowns]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5324861]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[what's in a name]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[glee]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[happy things]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[musicals]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[yay]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 28 Jul 2009 16:27:28 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lawson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5324861&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Another Reason to Love Shep Smith]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2009/07/thumb160x_6a584fbd01ffb2fa53f5208c296f444c.jpeg" class="left image158" width="158">Fox anchor and <a href="http://gawker.com/5303897/shep-smith-narrated-a-high+speed-chase-today">car chase</a> <a href="http://gawker.com/5308697/shep-smith-gets-another-late+afternoon-car-chase">aficionado</a> <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged SHEPARD SMITH" href="http://gawker.com/tag/shepard-smith/">Shepard Smith</a> is probably the best anchor on TV right now, both for pure entertainment value and for his genuinely non-partisan commitment to telling the truth as he sees it. Also <a href="http://www.boston.com/ae/tv/articles/2009/07/26/shepard_smith_is_rating_high_on_fox_news_channel/?page=full">he hates Boston.</a></p>
<p>Here's a classic little detail from <a href="http://gawker.com/5150647/fox-news-shep-smith-on-being-fair-and-balanced-i-dont-care-what-sean-hannity-thinks">one of those profiles</a> that basically tells you lots of things you already knew, like "Shep Smith is from the South and right-wing bloggers don't like him," but throws in a couple fun new anecdotes to keep you reading them:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Smith does spout strong opinions throughout the day, but they tend to be directed at LSU - the rival of his alma mater, Ole Miss - or at the Red Sox, eternal foes of his beloved New York Yankees. Trash talk comes with the territory; in the main newsroom at Fox News's Sixth Avenue headquarters, a fan on his desk bears the brand name "Boston," and underneath it, Smith has scrawled the word "Sucks."</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Hah. This is from a profile in <i>The Boston Globe</i>, too.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5323826/another-reason-to-love-shep-smith]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5323826]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[fox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[boston]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[boston sucks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cable news]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[shepard smith]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tv news]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 27 Jul 2009 12:40:49 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pareene]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5323826&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[TV Networks Bravely Fight for the Right to Think You Can Dance]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/7/2009/07/504x_custom_1248190471021_presser.jpg" class="left image500" width="500">As we plod through <a href="http://gawker.com/5301586/the-summer-people-stopped-watching-network-tv">The Summer People Stopped Watching Network TV</a>, said networks are making a fuss about <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged BARACK OBAMA" href="http://gawker.com/tag/barack-obama/">Barack Obama</a>'s insistence on holding press conferences because it temporarily prevents them from profiting from their endlessly looped last-gasp humiliation-based reality shows.</p>

<p>There has long been tension between the White House and the networks, who don't like having their excruciatingly calibrated schedules torn up by politicians for political purposes. So when Obama scheduled a press conference to discuss his health care proposals for 9 p.m. tomorrow night, which would seriously screw up the networks' plans, <a href="http://www.thrfeed.com/2009/07/cbs-obama-news-conference.html">the networks led by last-place NBC balked</a>, obliging Obama to move it to 8 o'clock. And Fox, like they did for Obama's last primetime presser, just told the White House to fuck off, but that's a different story.</p>
<p>In any case, in describing the programming scramble caused by the press conference, <em>The Hollywood Reporter</em> pretty much sums up why no one watches broadcast TV any more:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The stakes were particularly high for NBC, which airs the most-watched show of the summer, "America's Got Talent," at 9 p.m. This week, the reality hit includes a heavily promoted interview with "Britain's Got Talent" singing sensation Susan Boyle.... ABC News often has the highest-rated coverage of Obama's primetime events and ABC was leaning toward carrying the conference all day. In one respect, the shift to 8 p.m. could make their night more tricky. ABC's highest-rated reality show, "Wipeout," will be pushed to 9 p.m. to face "America's Got Talent" along with "So You Think You Can Dance," with "I Survived a Japanese Game Show" moved to 10 p.m. The ABC News special "Over a Barrel: The Truth About Oil," originally slated for 10 p.m. Wednesday, will air Friday as a special edition of "20/20."</p>
<p>Fox airs its top-rated two-hour "So You Think You Can Dance" on Wednesday nights and will direct viewers to Fox News for the news conference.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>That's right, television executives were willing to face down the White House over Susan Boyle and retreads of Japanese game shows where people bathe in squids and razor blades. <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/04/29/AR2005042900250.html">The last time this happened</a>, when George W. Bush scheduled a presser on the first day of May sweeps in 2005, they forced him to change the start time over <em>CSI</em>, <em>Will & Grace</em>, and <em>The O.C</em>. That's how far they've fallen. In their defense, summer has become the traditional time for vile reality TV. But the fact that NBC essentially told Barack Obama, "We are not going to take your press conference at 9 p.m. because we have to air a deranged foreign lady and amateur vocalist" is a good measure of just how desperate they are.</p>
<p>The solution of course, is to just break up the press conferences with ad slots. It's an engaged, Tivo-proof audience, and there are dozens of brands out there that would love to be associated with Obama. Back in February, his 8 p.m. presser netted NBC 9.75 million viewers&mdash;<a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/02/10/monday-ratings-obama-press-conference-averages-369-million-viewers/12483">2 million more than stuck around for <em>Heroes</em> an hour later</a>.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://defamer.gawker.com/5319462/tv-networks-bravely-fight-for-the-right-to-think-you-can-dance]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5319462]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[presidential preemption]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA["reality]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[abc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[barack obama]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cbs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nbc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 21 Jul 2009 11:46:03 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Cook]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5319462&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Kill American Prisoners, Fox News Demands]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><object width="502" height="309" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/AL9P6W9vt6E&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/AL9P6W9vt6E&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="502" height="309" class="left gawkerVideo"></object><a href="http://alicublog.blogspot.com/2009/05/generals-modest-proposal.html">Gazillion-Star General</a> and "Fox News Strategic Analyst" <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged RALPH PETERS" href="http://gawker.com/tag/ralph-peters/">Ralph Peters</a> never met a problem America couldn't solve by nuking a nation of brown people or Commies. That American soldier who got hisself captured by the Taliban? Peters says <a href="http://tpmtv.talkingpointsmemo.com/?id=2995960">let him hang!</a></p>
<p>Peters, who never saw combat, knows from his rich experience writing foreign policy fanfic that this American soldier is a liar and a deserter. Fox News just openly hates America, and the troops, and they should all be charged with treason.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gawker.com/5318801/kill-american-prisoners-fox-news-demands]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5318801]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[war is hell]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ralph peters]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[war]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[wtf]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:35:43 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pareene]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5318801&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Vicodin-Riddled Masses Demand Fox Save Their Slurry Queen]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/2009/07/custom_1248075714175_paula.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /> A <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/americanidoltracker/2009/07/keep-paula-a-grassroots-rebellion-sweeps-the-twitterverse.html">grassroots rebellion has seized Twitter</a> in an effort to save Paula's slot on the <em>Idol'</em>s judges panel. Will the Twitterverse switch their avatars from a Iran-protest green to a sparkly rainbows for Paula?</p>
<p><em>Fox</em>! What is going on with you? Your network has set the <a href="http://www.people.com/people/archive/article/0,,20150694,00.html">high water mark for quality</a> and now you choose to ruin your good name with this abysmal judgment? Why would you ditch Paula? Is it because she sat on a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ybm7UTozXU8">day laborer in <em>Brüno</em></a> (that was obviously a symbolic critique on our broken immigration policy!) You can't get rid of Paula. She is the slurred voice of the Vicodin riddled masses! She is the chorus in the Greek tragedy of <em>Idol</em> &mdash; which, obviously, makes Simon the smite-happy Zeus. Even though her remarks lack a certain insight they're like tight hugs to terrified contestants. Paula is the teacher that believes every child's finger-painting portrait belongs on the fridge. How can you turn your back on her? Here's a reminder of her wonderfulness:</p>
<p><strong>Musical theater tribute to Paula's big heart!<br></strong><br>
<object width="502" height="309" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/2YbiK5BJBW0&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/2YbiK5BJBW0&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="502" height="309" class="left gawkerVideo"></object></p>
<p><strong>Paula just wants your affection.</strong></p>
<p><object width="502" height="309" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_1"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/a5WPGLFSHxE&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/a5WPGLFSHxE&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="502" height="309" class="left gawkerVideo"></object></p>
<p><strong>Paula on the beauty of Jason Castro (and Leonard Cohen)!</strong></p>
<p><object width="502" height="309" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_2"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/hP4CgpAkt5I&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/hP4CgpAkt5I&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="502" height="309" class="left gawkerVideo"></object></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://defamer.gawker.com/5318335/the-vicodin+riddled-masses-demand-fox-save-their-slurry-queen]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gawker-5318335]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[keep paula]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[American, Idol]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Fly Girl]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[fox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[paula abdul]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Sad Times]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Shut Up, Twitter]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 20 Jul 2009 07:49:50 EDT]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Natasha VC]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gawker.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5318335&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		</channel>
</rss>
